▽ some dragns

918 Followers
1.1K Following
3.1K Posts

▽ the dragns (i'm all):
 ash (aka khr) - ashen dragon (xey/xem, they/them, it/its)
 kai - programmer synth dragon () (they/them, it/its)
🍊 pekoe - soft mega dragonite (she / her)
⚫️ ferra - ferrofluid synth (they / them, it / its)

my partners:  
 ember @Zest
 river @river

random gift art: probably okay if we're mutuals, but please ask first!

poly, agender, grey ace

pronounsthey/them
pronounsxey/xem (https://en.pronouns.page/xey,xem,xeir,xeirs,xemself,1,Neopronoun%20“xey/xem”)
world wide web sitehttps://dragon.monster/
weasylhttps://www.weasyl.com/~khr
furAffinityhttps://www.furaffinity.net/user/~khr
bluesky@khr.monster
art fighthttps://artfight.net/~-khr

anthropic has proudly announced[1] that their latest model is capable of burning down basically everything by automating the identification of significant vulnerabilities in open source code. and that you should pay them to use their llm to find and fix vulnerabilities first

i'm a programmer, not a computer security expert. the vulnerabilities discussed in the blog post seem significant, but it's not clear to me how serious they are and how often software like this deals with such bugs. i'm also not sure how different this is in practice from fuzz testing. anyone in infosec able to weigh in? how big of a deal is this?

[1] https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/

Claude Mythos Preview \ red.anthropic.com

sometimes you just wnna be a 2 headed dragon in a nice dress
anyone in the vancouver area got a good source of mail-order matcha tea, that isn't amazon?
followup question: do you identify as having aphantasia and/or face blindness?
i do not have aphantasia nor face blindness
50%
i have face blindness but not aphantasia
28.8%
i have aphantasia but not face blindness
18.2%
i have both aphantasia and face blindness
3%
Poll ended at .

1) when you close your eyes, can you visually imagine objects? e.g. picturing an apple with details like color, texture, shape, lighting, etc

2) when you close your eyes, can you visually imagine the faces of people you know very well? e.g. recalling details of the face of a spouse or family member, what they look like when making different facial expressions, etc. if possible try to separate this from recognizing them by non-facial features such as hair or accessories

1) yes / sort of ; 2) yes / sort of
66%
1) yes / sort of ; 2) not at all
19.8%
1) not at all ; 2) yes / sort of
0.9%
1) not at all ; 2) not at all
13.2%
Poll ended at .

as far as projects taking linguistic roots and rederiving them into english go, im a lot more enthusiastic about youtuber zzineohp's project[1] to give extinct animals common names, which makes extensive use of imagined loanings from various languages rather than focusing purely on PIE or germanic derivatives

[1] https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLd1TS7TQuvtO373OFSrE16Qf8ciu5UQB8

Extinct Common Names

YouTube

friend sent me this image which has sniped me directly in the linguistics autism

its a map by reddit user topherette posted 6 years ago on r/mapporn[1]. theyve taken chinese place name etymologies and roughly transliterated them to old english / germanic equivalents (with some exceptions for, i guess, flavor?)

which is a fun idea, if a bit imperalist. but the baffling thing is how they've done some of these. like how in the hell does "taiwan", which translates as "platform bay", end up as "folkstow"

based on their comments i don't think they actually speak any chinese language, they were just using a dictionary and internet etymologies. so my pale ass doing the same thing is probably not going to be able to do much better. but what the hell

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/hcjz1t/oc_fully_anglicised_china_based_off_actual/

i grew up eating red meat, but i haven't eaten it in years. cutting it out is the simplest and most effective thing you can do to reduce climate impact on an individual level

chicken and fish are less impactful on the environment and readily available most places. vegetables and grain are also plenty capable of giving you all the nutrients you need in your diet, and are easier to cook with, in my experience. and growing all the vegetables and grains you would need to support every american would take just 20% of the land we currently devote to agriculture that supports meat production.

this is the clearest communication i've heard on this topic, with specific sources and analysis supporting it:

no one should be eating (agricultural) red meat. it's bad for you, its bad for the ecosystems that are displaced by meat production, and its increasingly bad for the earth as a whole

quoting the interdisciplinary report that the video opens with:
« we must rapidly reduce meat consumption if the world is going to avoid ever more catastrophic climate change and environmental decline. »

whatever your personal feeling on it is, i urge you to watch the video. the food industry, specifically the large conglomerates that own most food production in the US, have done everything they can to cultivate uncertainty about this.

https://youtu.be/eo9iKHhcZuQ

The food industry is destroying us

YouTube

we

are the crystal dergs

we'll always save the day