iamthetotFeb 20

'We Thought It Would Be Fun': Nintendo Has a Whole FAQ on Why It's Selling Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen Separately for $20 Each - IGN

https://piefed.ca/c/games/p/539440/we-thought-it-would-be-fun-nintendo-has-a-whole-faq-on-why-it-s-selling-pokemon-firered-and

'We Thought It Would Be Fun': Nintendo Has a Whole FAQ on Why It's Selling Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen Separately for $20 Each - IGN

### Welcome 🍁 **Piefed.ca** is run by Canadians, hosted in Canada, and geared toward Canadians. However, it is not restricted to Canadians, or Canadian culture/topics/etc. All are welcome! To learn more about how the Fediverse works, you can visit our simple [Getting Started Guide](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/get-started). This site is run by the non-profit [Fedecan](https://fedecan.ca/) and funded entirely by user donations. You can help support us by visiting our [donations page](https://fedecan.ca/en/donate). --- #### Rules and Guidelines ::: spoiler 1. No Bigotry Including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. ::: ::: spoiler 2. Be Civil Argue in good faith, attack the argument; not the person, and promote a healthy debate. That includes implying violence, threats or wishes of violence and/or death. ::: ::: spoiler 3. No Porn This instance is not made to host porn communities. You're free to access porn communities on other instances through your account, but be mindful of Rule 4. ::: ::: spoiler 4. Use the NSFW tag Use your common sense: if you wouldn't want this image to show up on your work computer, tag it as such. In comments, use the `:::spoiler :::` tag for NSFW images, and put a NSFW mention beside links. Do not use NSFW images as your avatar or banner. ::: ::: spoiler 5. No Ads / Spam This instance is not there to act as your billboard. If you want to promote your personal work, at least make the effort to be a contributing member of this community. Your account purpose shouldn't be to only advertise, make it natural. ::: ::: spoiler 6. Bot account If you are the operator of a "bot" account, make sure to flag is as such in the [account's settings](/settings). ::: ::: spoiler 7. Right to privacy Do NOT distribute the personal information of someone else without their consent (aka doxxing). Information that is public domain can be shared, provided it is in good faith. *ex: The official email of an elected official is fair, the private phone number or the real name of a non-public person is NOT.* ::: ::: spoiler 8. Report abuse The report function isn't labelled the *disagree* button. You might not agree with someone, but that doesn't mean what the person says is against the rules. Using it repeately in this fashion will lead to actions being taken against the reporter. ::: ::: spoiler 9. Impersonation Don't make an account with the intent to negatively deceive or defame someone on the fediverse. *ex: Parody of a famous person is okay, submitting outrageous content as appearing like another user, mod or admin isn't.* ::: --- **Contact an Admin:** - Send us a message at [@[email protected]](https://lemmy.ca/u/admin) - Send us an email at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) **Guides:** You can find more guides at [fedecan.ca](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/get-started) by opening the sidebar. - [Welcome to the Fediverse](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/get-started) - [About Us (Fedecan)](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/fedecan/) **Meta Communities:** - [!main](/c/[email protected]): announcements & general discussion **Site Status:** [status.fedecan.ca](https://status.fedecan.ca/) **Other Frontends:** Don't like how Lemmy looks? Try one of our [alternative UIs](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/lemmy/for-users/alternative-uis): - [photon.piefed.ca](https://photon.piefed.ca/) (Photon) - [blorp.piefed.ca](https://blorp.piefed.ca/) (Blorp) --- **Find Apps:** [lemmyapps.com](https://www.lemmyapps.com/) **Find Communities:** [lemmyverse.net](https://lemmyverse.net/communities) **Fediseer:** [![endorsement](https://fediseer.com/api/v1/badges/endorsements/piefed.ca.svg)](https://gui.fediseer.com/instances/detail/piefed.ca)

Show threadGuitar
I know lemmy really has a strong sentiment against Nintendo, but for me personally, I am happy about this. I think its fair to download and emulate games when there is no legal version being offered anywhere. I would also say that being offered through subscription only doesn’t change that either. But if there is a version for sale by Nintendo, I am happy to buy that instead. I don’t think piracy is justified just because you are angry at a company. If I can purchase a copy on my modern system, that is the way I’m gonna go.
Feb 20 at 7:14pmWeb
Show threadNurse_RobotFeb 20
Piracy is justified because I already own those games, and they’re not backwards compatible. I’m not going to pay for the same game multiple times.
Show threadpeacefulpixelFeb 20
piracy is always justified
Show threadNurse_RobotFeb 20
Probably not from indie developers
Show threadathatetFeb 20
Even from indie devs. Many have said that if you don’t have the money to buy their game to get it and play it anyway. More eyes on it and word of mouth and whatnot.
Show threadGuitarFeb 20
Kinda wild to claim that a purchase of a game 20 years ago justifies pirating a game now. It’s not like no one had to do any work to get it going on Switch. They had to make GBA features connect between Switch systems. But you play how you wanna play. I just don’t like all the gatekeeping a lot of people do about people buying a copy.
Show threadNurse_RobotFeb 20
Do you work for the billion dollar company? Weird fucking take you have portraying them as a victim
Show threadGuitarFeb 21
I mean there are smaller people who work at the billion dollar company. You think the devs who ported this release at Nintendo are billionaires? Just because you hate a brand doesn’t mean everything that they do is exclusively handled by greedy mustache-twirling villains. The games industry is full of regular people who deserve to get paid just as much as anyone else does. I’m not going to justify fucking those people over by pretending they don’t exist while I steal from a faceless brand. A handful of greedy assholes making decisions at the top aren’t the only people who are impacted.
Show threadNurse_RobotFeb 21
Thinking that pirating a $20 game from Nintendo is fucking someone over is a wild take. Stop treating international giga corporations like people
Show threadGuitarFeb 21
It’s moreso that if I made something and worked hard on it, I wouldn’t think people were justified in stealing it just because they think the company I work for is shitty. I want to pay those people for something they made that I enjoyed. I don’t see Nintendo as a person, but I do see the people at Nintendo as people. At the end of the day, your $20 boycott isn’t going to make or break it for those people. But they do deserve my money when they create something I enjoy in my opinion. You are welcome to disagree and not buy it all you want.
Show threadElectricMachmanFeb 21
The work was already done, and the people who worked on it have already been paid. Nobody’s getting royalties here.
Show threadRyanmiller70Feb 21
The devs already got paid. The money spent buying this game just goes to the higher ups who spent 0 time actually working on the game.
Show threadKilgore TroutFeb 21
You were right in your first comment, but this is plainly false. Not pirating, mind, but making copies of what you already own is legal, at least in US and most of Europe.
Show threadGuitarFeb 21
Copying what you already own is another thing entirely. If it’s from your own copy, do whatever you want.
Show threadKilgore TroutFeb 21
I do whatever I want regardless. That you go out of your way to defend the multi-billion company from copyright theft is pointless, when nowadays agents like Meta have been reported stealing millions of copyrighted materials and nothing happened.
Show threadZedstrianFeb 20

If a company shows no respect for its consumers by nickel and diming them for everything, then there is no reason to show a company respect by purchasing its products.

If they re-released their entire back catalogue at reasonable prices—not locking them behind a subscription—with a commitment to letting users transfer them to future consoles without an upgrade fee, then things would be different.

Show threadiamthetotFeb 20

If a company shows no respect for its consumers by nickel and diming them for everything, then there is no reason to show a company respect by purchasing its products.

Sure, but there is a difference between not giving them money, and not giving them money but getting their product anyway.

“I don’t like your product or practices, so I’m not going to purchase it” is not the same as “I like your product but not your practices, so I’m going to pirate it.”

Video games are not exactly a vital good like food.

Show threadZedstrianFeb 20

Blind consumer loyalty only incentivizes Nintendo to further raise prices and make their products less consumer friendly.

Piracy simply demonstrates a problem with supply; if Nintendo wants to solve it, the solution isn’t trying to cuts heads off of a hydra, but rather adjust prices to capture unrealized market potential.

Show threadiamthetotFeb 20
I did not say anything about blind consumer loyalty, so that comment feels strange in the context of this conversation.
Show threadGuitarFeb 21
I’m curious, what is a reasonable price to you for these games? Because as far as I’m concerned, buying both games for the price of buying one of them 20 years ago feels pretty reasonable. I agree that they drip feed the fuck out of us on actually providing a way to play these games. But releasing these games in a way that you can bring forward to additional systems, and not putting them behind a subscription is a move that should be prasied. I just think it’s a step in the right direction. I’ll take the ability to own one game on my modern system over owning zero.
Show threadZedstrianFeb 21

Unlike physical cartridges, a digital, emulated copy of FireRed has no resale or collector’s value. Also, as the primary cost in developing such titles is the emulator, Nintendo could release additional GBA games in this manner with minimal additional effort.

Considering those factors, and the Switch having a higher install base than prior systems (over ten times Wii U unit sales), maintaining the Wii U and 3DS price points is the most reasonable means for Nintendo to monetize their back catalogue in a way that makes piracy less enticing for many people: $3 per GB, $4 per GBC, $5 per NES, $7-8 per GBA, $8 per SNES, $10 per N64, and $20 per Wii game price point.

Given that each console only requires an emulator to be developed once (something Nintendo has already done for NSO) to support hundreds of paid titles, there’s no need to increase prices when the games will sell several times more than they had any chance to on the Wii U.

Given how many games NSO includes, they could continue offering them that way for people who prefer renting their library. Consumers want meaningful options; pricing a GBA game at $20 is not that.

Show threadGuitarFeb 21
Fair enough, I would personally prefer those price points too. I agree that this isn’t a particularly meaningful option. But it is significantly more meaningful than what existed before it. I think the big disparity on the pricing is a symptom of everything having a subscription nowadays. Not justifying it, just acknowledging it. They probably tell themselves that $20 for one game is fair becuase they could have charged $20/month if they added it to NSO. It does feel high, but just the added value of not having to pay a subscription every month or year to play this game feels significant to me. I recognize that’s a bit dystopian, but it feels like a little breathing room in this gaming landscape.
Show threadHaunchesTVFeb 20
Show threadGuitarFeb 21
No need to attack me for stating an opinion. You could try discussing the topic instead of contributing nothing to the conversation.
Show threadHaunchesTVFeb 21
If you thought that was an attack then you’re about thin skinned enough to be a Nintendo stan. Congrats.