'We Thought It Would Be Fun': Nintendo Has a Whole FAQ on Why It's Selling Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen Separately for $20 Each - IGN

https://piefed.ca/c/games/p/539440/we-thought-it-would-be-fun-nintendo-has-a-whole-faq-on-why-it-s-selling-pokemon-firered-and

'We Thought It Would Be Fun': Nintendo Has a Whole FAQ on Why It's Selling Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen Separately for $20 Each - IGN

### Welcome 🍁 **Piefed.ca** is run by Canadians, hosted in Canada, and geared toward Canadians. However, it is not restricted to Canadians, or Canadian culture/topics/etc. All are welcome! To learn more about how the Fediverse works, you can visit our simple [Getting Started Guide](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/get-started). This site is run by the non-profit [Fedecan](https://fedecan.ca/) and funded entirely by user donations. You can help support us by visiting our [donations page](https://fedecan.ca/en/donate). --- #### Rules and Guidelines ::: spoiler 1. No Bigotry Including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. ::: ::: spoiler 2. Be Civil Argue in good faith, attack the argument; not the person, and promote a healthy debate. That includes implying violence, threats or wishes of violence and/or death. ::: ::: spoiler 3. No Porn This instance is not made to host porn communities. You're free to access porn communities on other instances through your account, but be mindful of Rule 4. ::: ::: spoiler 4. Use the NSFW tag Use your common sense: if you wouldn't want this image to show up on your work computer, tag it as such. In comments, use the `:::spoiler :::` tag for NSFW images, and put a NSFW mention beside links. Do not use NSFW images as your avatar or banner. ::: ::: spoiler 5. No Ads / Spam This instance is not there to act as your billboard. If you want to promote your personal work, at least make the effort to be a contributing member of this community. Your account purpose shouldn't be to only advertise, make it natural. ::: ::: spoiler 6. Bot account If you are the operator of a "bot" account, make sure to flag is as such in the [account's settings](/settings). ::: ::: spoiler 7. Right to privacy Do NOT distribute the personal information of someone else without their consent (aka doxxing). Information that is public domain can be shared, provided it is in good faith. *ex: The official email of an elected official is fair, the private phone number or the real name of a non-public person is NOT.* ::: ::: spoiler 8. Report abuse The report function isn't labelled the *disagree* button. You might not agree with someone, but that doesn't mean what the person says is against the rules. Using it repeately in this fashion will lead to actions being taken against the reporter. ::: ::: spoiler 9. Impersonation Don't make an account with the intent to negatively deceive or defame someone on the fediverse. *ex: Parody of a famous person is okay, submitting outrageous content as appearing like another user, mod or admin isn't.* ::: --- **Contact an Admin:** - Send us a message at [@[email protected]](https://lemmy.ca/u/admin) - Send us an email at [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) **Guides:** You can find more guides at [fedecan.ca](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/get-started) by opening the sidebar. - [Welcome to the Fediverse](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/get-started) - [About Us (Fedecan)](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/fedecan/) **Meta Communities:** - [!main](/c/[email protected]): announcements & general discussion **Site Status:** [status.fedecan.ca](https://status.fedecan.ca/) **Other Frontends:** Don't like how Lemmy looks? Try one of our [alternative UIs](https://fedecan.ca/en/guide/lemmy/for-users/alternative-uis): - [photon.piefed.ca](https://photon.piefed.ca/) (Photon) - [blorp.piefed.ca](https://blorp.piefed.ca/) (Blorp) --- **Find Apps:** [lemmyapps.com](https://www.lemmyapps.com/) **Find Communities:** [lemmyverse.net](https://lemmyverse.net/communities) **Fediseer:** [![endorsement](https://fediseer.com/api/v1/badges/endorsements/piefed.ca.svg)](https://gui.fediseer.com/instances/detail/piefed.ca)

You ain’t going to jail for downloading a GBA game. And it is much cheaper than 20 dollars (except if you really want to play it on a switch for some reason)
Even if you really want to play on Switch there are CFW options that enable GBA emulation.
Yeah but those require either an specific type of Switch or a modchip (which does cost a little AND requires soldering)
Nintendo thinks their customers are fucking dumb morons

Well… I mean, do you remember the height of Pokémon Go?

A 2017 study estimated that in the first 148 days following its July 2016 launch, Pokémon Go was linked to 256 traffic-related deaths and over 100,000 accidents in the US due to distracted driving. These incidents, caused by users playing while driving or walking, also led to significant injuries and billions in economic damages.

I remember when there wasn’t much more to worry about besides a surge of people going outside with their phones.

Those were the days.

Pokemon go to the polls
At least they added the speedometer so if you go too fast the game doesn’t work.
Made playing the game on public transit impossible though :/
Or as a passenger in a car

As much as I think nintendo and the pokemon company are evil shits, I do believe overall pokemon go was net positive for humanity.

The physical health benefit from all those people walking around, and the mental health benefits from said populations being more social and friendly with others won’t ever show a statistic for lives saved, but I think it’s reasonable to assume lives will be saved from extra exercise and positive social interactions.

I do agree, but it’s too bad they ran both that game and the goodwill generated by it into the ground.
Yes, yes they do. And many are considering that they’re doing this.

Because they are? How many YouTubers are playing The Hot New Thing from Nintendo right now, because they bought it? They are the ones perpetuating this shit. It’s all a feedback loop meant to suck as much money out of the public as they can.

I can go and find at least 6 YouTubers that I subscribe to that almost always play the newest of the new thing so it’s featured on their channel. RTGame, Mo1stCr1t1kal/Penguinz0, Game Grumps, IronPineapple, VideogameDunkey, OboeShoes, hell even General Sam as much as I love his style and humor.

Game Grumps got in trouble from what I remember using emulators haha.

I actually forgot that Game Grumps only play the newest of the new when it’s from a particular series or something.

Why did they get in trouble? Was it with Nintendo or the fans? I kinda remember some “controversy” over them using emulators instead of original hardware, but imo that’s bullshit. Sometimes old hardware isn’t better, and all kinds of things can go wrong with it.

I wish I remembered…Im spacing right now and search isnt coming up with anything. I just remember there was a small stink because some game or another was too expensive? And they just emulated it but showed one of the screens? Its been many years.

Yeah, seems about right for some of the purists out there. There’s a whole fucking subreddit dedicated to talking shit about them. It’s honestly sad.

Like it’s one thing to have a semi-parasocial relationship and call it “hanging out with your friends” but it’s another entirely to dedicate time out of your life to get upset and angry over a goddamn YouTube channel.

“hanging out with your friends”

That is not semi-parasocial, it is full parasocial, and you should do your best to discourage that kind of sentiment if ever conveyed genuinely.

I know it’s a tough subject. Pretty much everyone is semi-parasocial. But describing someone you literally don’t know and just watch content from is parasocial and an incredibly delusional and dangerous mindset.

You mean the same people who in the same breath complain about the state of Pokémon and immediately follow up by saying they’re going to buy it anyway? Those people? 😅
Then they know their audience. Source: Nintendo customer
You know there are Nintendo fans and then there are Pokemon fans. They have a reputation of not really being into games but being into everything Pokemon.
I think Nintendo is right

everything about this release is ridiculous

20$ is way too expensive for what it is, it should honestly be 10/15$ at most
why just fire red/leaf green? why not other pokémon games? ruby, sapphire, emerald, these have never been rereleased!
why are all language versions separate purchases??? you couldn’t be arsed to bundle them?
the only new feature of this release, and really the only reason one might want to use this version instead of emulating on another platform, pokémon home compatibility, is not available at launch and will be added later. come on.

anyways play cassette beasts instead
Monster sanctuary was a lot of fun too
Coromon rocks! And its only 5$ on steam.
LumenTale just released a new trailer today.
LumenTale: Memories of Trey | Multiplayer Trailer

YouTube
ohhh cool thanks!
Monster Sanctuary had much worse graphics and the story was not engaging at all but somehow I still enjoyed it a lot more than Cassette Beasts.

I liked Nexomon Extinction, and am looking forward to Nexomon 3D.

People shit on it a lot but I played TemTem at release and the whole time felt sad because it was what I’d so long wished that Pokémon would become.
Seconded on Cassette Beasts. Beat the game, then play it with random beast typings.
I bought their album, its fantastic. Cassette Beasts is the best pokemon.
Such a good game! It did not have to have all the extra features it does to be worth the purchase, but they loaded this game with fun!
Sorry, Shin Megami Tensei has already won me over. Can’t beat fighting and having gods fighting for you in my book
I know lemmy really has a strong sentiment against Nintendo, but for me personally, I am happy about this. I think its fair to download and emulate games when there is no legal version being offered anywhere. I would also say that being offered through subscription only doesn’t change that either. But if there is a version for sale by Nintendo, I am happy to buy that instead. I don’t think piracy is justified just because you are angry at a company. If I can purchase a copy on my modern system, that is the way I’m gonna go.
Piracy is justified because I already own those games, and they’re not backwards compatible. I’m not going to pay for the same game multiple times.
piracy is always justified
Probably not from indie developers
Even from indie devs. Many have said that if you don’t have the money to buy their game to get it and play it anyway. More eyes on it and word of mouth and whatnot.
Kinda wild to claim that a purchase of a game 20 years ago justifies pirating a game now. It’s not like no one had to do any work to get it going on Switch. They had to make GBA features connect between Switch systems. But you play how you wanna play. I just don’t like all the gatekeeping a lot of people do about people buying a copy.
Do you work for the billion dollar company? Weird fucking take you have portraying them as a victim
I mean there are smaller people who work at the billion dollar company. You think the devs who ported this release at Nintendo are billionaires? Just because you hate a brand doesn’t mean everything that they do is exclusively handled by greedy mustache-twirling villains. The games industry is full of regular people who deserve to get paid just as much as anyone else does. I’m not going to justify fucking those people over by pretending they don’t exist while I steal from a faceless brand. A handful of greedy assholes making decisions at the top aren’t the only people who are impacted.
Thinking that pirating a $20 game from Nintendo is fucking someone over is a wild take. Stop treating international giga corporations like people
It’s moreso that if I made something and worked hard on it, I wouldn’t think people were justified in stealing it just because they think the company I work for is shitty. I want to pay those people for something they made that I enjoyed. I don’t see Nintendo as a person, but I do see the people at Nintendo as people. At the end of the day, your $20 boycott isn’t going to make or break it for those people. But they do deserve my money when they create something I enjoy in my opinion. You are welcome to disagree and not buy it all you want.
The work was already done, and the people who worked on it have already been paid. Nobody’s getting royalties here.
The devs already got paid. The money spent buying this game just goes to the higher ups who spent 0 time actually working on the game.
You were right in your first comment, but this is plainly false. Not pirating, mind, but making copies of what you already own is legal, at least in US and most of Europe.
Copying what you already own is another thing entirely. If it’s from your own copy, do whatever you want.
I do whatever I want regardless. That you go out of your way to defend the multi-billion company from copyright theft is pointless, when nowadays agents like Meta have been reported stealing millions of copyrighted materials and nothing happened.

If a company shows no respect for its consumers by nickel and diming them for everything, then there is no reason to show a company respect by purchasing its products.

If they re-released their entire back catalogue at reasonable prices—not locking them behind a subscription—with a commitment to letting users transfer them to future consoles without an upgrade fee, then things would be different.

If a company shows no respect for its consumers by nickel and diming them for everything, then there is no reason to show a company respect by purchasing its products.

Sure, but there is a difference between not giving them money, and not giving them money but getting their product anyway.

“I don’t like your product or practices, so I’m not going to purchase it” is not the same as “I like your product but not your practices, so I’m going to pirate it.”

Video games are not exactly a vital good like food.

Blind consumer loyalty only incentivizes Nintendo to further raise prices and make their products less consumer friendly.

Piracy simply demonstrates a problem with supply; if Nintendo wants to solve it, the solution isn’t trying to cuts heads off of a hydra, but rather adjust prices to capture unrealized market potential.

I did not say anything about blind consumer loyalty, so that comment feels strange in the context of this conversation.
I’m curious, what is a reasonable price to you for these games? Because as far as I’m concerned, buying both games for the price of buying one of them 20 years ago feels pretty reasonable. I agree that they drip feed the fuck out of us on actually providing a way to play these games. But releasing these games in a way that you can bring forward to additional systems, and not putting them behind a subscription is a move that should be prasied. I just think it’s a step in the right direction. I’ll take the ability to own one game on my modern system over owning zero.

Unlike physical cartridges, a digital, emulated copy of FireRed has no resale or collector’s value. Also, as the primary cost in developing such titles is the emulator, Nintendo could release additional GBA games in this manner with minimal additional effort.

Considering those factors, and the Switch having a higher install base than prior systems (over ten times Wii U unit sales), maintaining the Wii U and 3DS price points is the most reasonable means for Nintendo to monetize their back catalogue in a way that makes piracy less enticing for many people: $3 per GB, $4 per GBC, $5 per NES, $7-8 per GBA, $8 per SNES, $10 per N64, and $20 per Wii game price point.

Given that each console only requires an emulator to be developed once (something Nintendo has already done for NSO) to support hundreds of paid titles, there’s no need to increase prices when the games will sell several times more than they had any chance to on the Wii U.

Given how many games NSO includes, they could continue offering them that way for people who prefer renting their library. Consumers want meaningful options; pricing a GBA game at $20 is not that.

Fair enough, I would personally prefer those price points too. I agree that this isn’t a particularly meaningful option. But it is significantly more meaningful than what existed before it. I think the big disparity on the pricing is a symptom of everything having a subscription nowadays. Not justifying it, just acknowledging it. They probably tell themselves that $20 for one game is fair becuase they could have charged $20/month if they added it to NSO. It does feel high, but just the added value of not having to pay a subscription every month or year to play this game feels significant to me. I recognize that’s a bit dystopian, but it feels like a little breathing room in this gaming landscape.