Americans, if you have not done first aid training in the last five years, I strongly recommend getting a refresher now, and starting to carry a trauma kit with you when you leave the house.

It looks like most of the US Red Cross first aid courses are very superficial, so you'll have to go digging for local resources. The syllabus I recommend is the one offered by the UK and most EU Red Cross groups, including their optimal mental health response unit, and ideally something on using Narcan and Epi pens. You can find it here: https://www.redcrossfirstaidtraining.co.uk/courses/first-aid-training/first-aid-at-work/

If you're piecing together a course from other offerings, you definitely want to make sure that you're doing CPR basics, massive hemorrhage/bleed stop, and shock/stroke at least. If you can find a trainer who can also add to the UK curriculum a treatment protocol for tear gas and pepper spray, that's great. You're going to receive a ton of information in these courses, so please take good notes (and hopefully you'll get the training slides to take home). Make up your own cheat sheets for the core diagnostic procedures — ADCDE/MARCH, AVPU etc. and keep them in your kit. Better yet, also go with some friends — it's always more fun that way and you'll retain more when you're comfortable and having fun — and then spend an evening every month or so going through some basic drills to keep each other fresh.

First Aid at Work course (3-day) | Red Cross Training

Open graph description

Red Cross Training

Here's what I recommended (and carry) for an individual first aid kit (IFAK):

Core trauma kit:
2 North American Rescue CAT7 tourniquets (no substitution), prestaged for one-handed application
2-3 packs compressed gauze, ideally one or all treated with a hemostatic clotting agent
2 pairs of vented chest seals
1 6" pressure bandage, "Israeli" style or similar
Trauma shears
2 pairs nitrile gloves
Mylar emergency blanket
Sharpie for writing TQ application time

Not core trauma but good to have:
2 Narcan doses
Fold-up plastic CPR mask
Dispersible (powdered) aspirin for heart attacks
Runner's sugar gel, for diabetic collapse
Triangular bandage, sterile if you can so it can double as an improvised pressure bandage
Ocular baggage
2 chemical hand warner pairs for helping with core temperature in cold weather

If you have the space and it won't limit where you carry the bag, a booboo kit:
4 Saline wipes for wound cleaning
Pack of large steri-strips for wound closure
4x4 Non-adherent bandage
2 Burn gel packets
4 Normal bandaids
2 Antacid pills
2 3" Pieces of kinesio tape for blisters (round the corners; stays on better)

For protests, add 1-2 sealed bottles of water with sports cap for eyewash (use only clean water or saline, never anything else)

Normal rules are that your IFAK is only for use on you, but that assumes a) active combat, and b) everyone carrying one in the same place so others can kind it and c) everyone being trained to use it; do what makes sense in context.

Folks who have advanced training might want to add more stuff, but at that point you know what you like. Specifically, I do not recommend carrying decompression needles or nasal-pharyngial airways unless you've been trained on them — they're unlikely to do much good without training, and the needles especially can cause real harm if used incorrectly. Note: I am trained in first aid, but I'm not an EMT, etc. I have, however, spent a good chunk of time digging into stuff here and talked with friends with more training about it extensively. Happy to hear opinions from other folks with more training here too.

Here's my IFAK, with a 15cm ruler for scale, which has all the nice to haves on it. You can go smaller, but this nicely clips on to my around town bag and doesn't scream "I'm carrying tactical medical" too loudly.
Inside, the tourniquets and shears are immediately accessible and the rest of the trauma essentials are in a pullout for fast access; booboo kit and secondary stuff is in ziplocks, and the stuff in the pullout is held in place with elastic so the contents don't go flying when I open it.

Finally, if you have the money, consider buying body armor, especially if you're doing ICE observer work. I recommend getting a wrap-around softt armor vest that's rated as class IIIA — one you can wear over an undershirt and under e.g. a hoodie. These provide a baseline of protection while being relatively easy to conceal, so you're not targeted specifically for wearing armor. While soft armor is less likely to stop rounds intended for you, it may keep you alive if you're hit by a ricochet or an untrained office shooting into a crowd or e.g. at someone on the other side of a thin wall.

Do get a vest that can also support hard plates for added protection when conditions warrant, and if possible also buy the plates. For plates, you want either the lighter class IIIA+ (not part of the NJI standard, but commonly used by manufacturers) or cjass IV, preferably the latter. Do not buy steel armor; it's very heavy and impact spalling from the back of the plate can cause almost as much damage as the round would have if the coating fails. Also, do not buy flat armor — it's very uncomfortable to wear; multi-curve is best if you can find it.
Your plates should be either UHMWPE or ceramic. For ceramic plates, make sure that your plates provide edge to edge coverage — there should only be a few millimeters of protective coating on the edge of the plate. Cheap plates may have a half inch or more on the edge of the plate where there isn't actually armor.

There are three plate shapes that you'll commonly see — SAPI, Shooter's Cut, and Swimmer's Cut. You probably want SAPI; the other two provide less coverage but more mobility for shouldering a rifle or swimming with armor on. You can also get side plates — standard front and back plates obviously only protect against threats you're facing. These add a lot of bulk, though and make armor very difficult to conceal; they're probably overkill.

You may wish to consider a helmet, but of course a helmet is likely to make you a target. You might be able to disguise a ballistic helmet as a bike helmet. The PASGT style is your best bet as a starting point for that sort of thing.

Oh, one last thing — while you're reading this and thinking about your personal safety, go check your fire extinguishers and make sure they haven't expired (ten years) and that they're still showing green on pressure. One in each adult bedroom, one plus a fire blanket for grease fires in the kitchen, one for the garage or workshop, plus one for the car is a good rule.
Ok, one more last thing but this is really it. If your local organizing communities are offering de-escalation training, take them up on it. It's a great way to get involved and learn skills you may use in the rest of your life too, and it can be very very important when it comes to keeping yourself safe — as much as the rest of all this. Now, I'm not gonna pretend that talking down a Nazi who's actively trying to kill you is going to work, or is a remotely good idea — that's not how we deal with Nazis — but there are still plenty of cases where it can make a difference, including, critically, helping to diffuse tensions inside the broad and important but potentially awkward coalitions that we may find ourselves working within these days, so that the real work can continue.
@dymaxion There is an organization called stopthebleed.org here, a narrower scope
@ZeroHour
Yeah — I strongly recommend folks get the full three day if possible and not just the massive hemorrhage training. Anything is better than nothing, but you're still much more likely to encounter a serious fall or burn, a heart attack or stroke, a diabetic coma, or an overdose than you are gunshot wounds.
@dymaxion Unfortunately I've never seen any offered as you describe to the average person. I have taken red cross trainings in the past but as you mentioned they are not as comprehensive as what you are describing.
@ZeroHour
Interesting. It looks like the BLS/ALS courses might be more comprehensive? They're targeted at healthcare folks, but they don't seem to actually require organizational affiliation.

@dymaxion @neurovagrant i started getting to know local organizers and groups at my first bleeding control class

its like that saying "the best time to plant a tree was 10 Years ago, second best time is today". getting to know, in person, people who can share info and organize help is so important

Green Guard First Aid & Safety : QR WoundSeal Powder (for larger wounds)

@bhasic
Yeah, coban is great in a more general kit, but this is primarily trauma-focused. You can do a lot of what you'd do with 1" coban with the triangular bandage in a pinch, and that does other stuff too. I hadn't seen the woundseal prefer before — how does it compare with hemostasic gauze?
@dymaxion I haven't tried it, but I bought it for the first aid cabinet at my workplace in the construction industry. The salesperson praised it as effective. It stops heavy bleeding really quickly.
@dymaxion interestingly, I went to follow an official training of first aid responder in an office setting at the Red Cross in Belgium (companies here must train first aid responders depending on their size - and yeah, it's far from "first aid in a confrontation with a weaponised mob" setting, ok) and they were very very cautious about the tourniquet. They don't provide them in kits, insist that only official specific models are used, and it's really in a specific extreme wounds on limbs.

@WowSuchCyber
So, tourniquets are incredibly special purpose — they're only used in cases of massive hemorrhage on limbs — they have no other purpose. Tourniquets, especially they're on for more than an hour, can cause serious tissue damage, and you don't want to use them if it's not an arterial bleed — and you'll know if it is, because you're looking at blood flows in the range of a liter a minute. In that context, the risk of tissue damage is outweighed by the fact that without it the patient will be dead inside five minutes. Like the Belgian Red Cross, I don't recommend using any tourniquet model not approved by the US committee on tactical casualty care as a primary management tool for massive hemorrhage. In practice, I only use the North American Rescue CAT tourniquet and that's what I suggest to others. The Safeguard SWAT-T can be a nice backup in an aid bag intended for treating others (in part because it can also be used as a more general purpose pressure bandage), but I'd still have CATs as primary even then, and I don't use it at all in individual kits.

Belgium has a both better road safety and vanishingly few gunshot wounds compared to the US, which are the primary contexts where tourniquets matter, so them not recommending them for normal kits isn't surprising. The US is a very different place here.

@dymaxion indeed, the context is very different, you're right. The key concept they wanted us to remember is that we are there "only" to prepare the arrival of professionals, which in our country is always in less than 12 minutes. For example they advised to never give any medication (except only if the subject has his own medication and is requesting it). Not even désinfection spray! I was surprised!

@WowSuchCyber
Yeah. EMT arrival times in the US aren't always as reliable even in big cities, and if you're far enough out in a rural area, it could easily be an hour or two even if they're immediately available if it's not urgent enough to require a helicopter. Even in Belgium, a mass casualty might have very immediate personnel on site, but that doesn't mean they can get to every victim fast enough, and in a police riot, they may be intentionally delayed.

I can kind of see the disinfection spray thing, honestly — it's one less thing for the EMT to have to figure out and they're going to immediately re-clean a wound if that's indicated, because they can't rely on you having done it correctly. The exceptions to that rule are going to be EpiPens — the patient not be able to request it — and Narcan, where the patient definitely will not be able to. Folks who will need an EpiPen will generally have one, and if they don't, knowing what to do is a bit more advanced even if you have one (and as they're usually prescription, legally more complicated in some countries). Narcan, on the other hand, should (but isn't always, sadly) over the counter everywhere and carries little or no medical risk for unnecessary application other than someone having a really shit day. Given how many European countries have serious overdose problems, if they're not encouraging folks to carry it and training them, they're treating the lives of people who use as inherently disposable.

@dymaxion I had to kagi what narcan was! Not a word about that during the training. The manual we received mention to wait out for the ambulance and not to cover the victim for drug intoxication (covering victims with an emergency blanket is otherwise systematic). They also emphasised that if we decide to give anything to victims we'd be liable for it... so I think it's mainly why we're asked to not give anything and rely on speed of intervention (which as you mention is theoretical).

@WowSuchCyber
Yeah, 12 minutes is too slow for overdoses, and in a lot of places if you call in something that could be an overdose, especially in the wrong part of town, they'll send cops instead of EMTs. Drunkenness too. In Finland, unless it's changed, the cops refused to carry Narcan because, "if they did, they might be expected to have used it in cases where it would be indicated".

If you think it's an OD and you don't have Narcan, call in a heart attack instead. You'll get EMTs and they will carry it. Also, the training for it is fast — like, 30 minutes tops. Worth getting it and carrying some; this year's drugs are real rough.