1/2 Two new blog pieces. In which I have opinions about GenAI and open-source: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/202x/2026/02/16/GenAI-and-OSS-opinion
1/2 Two new blog pieces. In which I have opinions about GenAI and open-source: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/202x/2026/02/16/GenAI-and-OSS-opinion
2/2 … and in which I describe the second of the two Quamina-related Claude interventions, namely an automated port from Go to Rust: https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/202x/2026/02/14/Q-Plus-C-Ch2
@timbray In #curl we see good in code reviews by LLMs. But they generate a flood initially. There are issues they can find and others they are blind to
New is that they find discrepancies between comments and code. In something as old and alive as #curl this is very useful. No other tool can do that.
But we get access for free, having a brand. These are not cheap. And we could not pay for them, so…
AI economics are nuts. Bananas.
Congratulations. Your open source project is now the Nazi Bar.
I wish I hadn't lost a whole community I thought were friends last year after I pointed out the ridiculous exceptionalism of white guys in tech who think that somehow *their* Nazi Bar isn't *really* a Nazi Bar, and that I'm the problem for pointing out the fucking Nazis sitting right there sipping beer. If that hadn't happened, I might have the energy to try and persuade you. But it did, so I don't.
Enjoy the beer.
@timbray I somewhat agree with your conclusions in part 3 (can't find that post now), but I don't get how you think coding is exempt from responsibility for the environmental impact. Maybe I can see the sweatshop argument, but aren't these big AIs trained on more than just code? They need a grasp of English, at least.
Whole industries are trying to retool to fix a 4% of total CO2 output. Coding bots don't get a free pass.