"Between raising two young boys and putting in long hours at a marketing job, Kevin Caldwell can almost never find the time to make dinner. So he and his husband spend about $700 a week to order in"

https://lemmy.world/post/42552110

I totally feel that guy. Cooking sucks. If you have the money, that time can be spent on something better instead.
The quality if the food you eat is such a big determiner for quality of life though… I would rather spent a few hours every weekend mealprepping and living an extra ten years of healthy active life. Plus, if you can save 600 dollars on food you might be able to just work less.
It really depends on the restaurant. Eating Chick-fil-A every day certainly isn’t healthy. But there are plenty of proper restaurants that are.

The problem is that in almost every case, restaurants’ only objectives are to make food that tastes good and make customers think they’re getting a good value. Hence, tons of high-caloric additives and huge portions.

When you cook at home, even if you use oils and other high-caloric ingredients, you still use way less than restaurants do. I promise you, take a “healthy” meal from a restaurant and compare its nutritional content to the same thing you would make at home; the difference will be drastic.

A couple examples:

  • Broccoli side dish. Cooked at home in a pan; some oil and salt and pepper. In a restaurant? Drowning in butter and tons of salt.
  • baked potato. At home, some cheese and sour cream. In a restaurant? Bigger potato with tons of butter, sour cream, gobs of cheese, bacon.
  • In these examples, both taste good. But the restaurant versions are tons of empty calories that contribute to a very unhealthy lifestyle. Don’t get me wrong, I like that shit too. But it’s rare for me, I’d rather make it myself and control what goes in.

    When you cook at home, even if you use oils and other high-caloric ingredients, you still use way less than restaurants do.

    How much do you want to bet?

    One example:

    I’m concerned that I didn’t get butter when I went to the store on Friday because after I came home my wife told me she moved the last four pounds of butter out of the freezer.

    I also have heavy cream in the fridge to make ice cream. If there’s not a layer of lard on your spoon after you’re done eating your ice cream, you aren’t really trying.

    Ok, but… using butter is ok. I’m willing to bet restaurants use even more for each meal. Also, I cream is… ice cream. How much do you have in a serving when you make it at home? Is it two baseball-sized scoops full of Reese’s peanut butter cups?

    Well, I don’t like having Reece’s peanut butter cups in my ice cream, so I wouldn’t get that.

    I think what you may not be considering is the ongoing shrinkflation happening at restaurants.

    I used to get the “Super Sundae” at Friendly’s. It’s served in a fishbowl style dish. They used to fill it with ice cream past the top of the bowl, with toppings including whipped cream above that. The last time I was there, the top of the whipped cream didn’t reach the top of the bowl.

    (it doesn’t look like this anymore)

    In answer to your question, having home made ice cream at home, I’m having 4-5 large scoops.

    I’m not going to reach the end of my life wishing I had eaten more ice cream.

    Well then I guess your one self-reported anecdotal datum proves me wrong. Carry on.
    Well then I guess thank you for conceding the point that I know more about the food I make than you do.
    Wasn’t that called a Jim Dandy?

    The Jim Dandy is a banana split made in the super sundae bowl. The one pictured is a Reese’s Pieces super sundae.

    Reese’s pieces, vanilla ice cream, peanut butter and marshmallow sauce, whipped cream and a cherry.

    If I’m remembering correctly, the super sundae was originally supposed to be five scoops of ice cream.

    I suppose it still could be, but maybe their scoops are shrinking.