THAT GOT HIM BANNED??? NOT THE ANIMAL ABUSE??

That was debunked.

Not to the satisfaction of people who care about the ethical treatment of pets.

Oh whatever, don’t even play that card. If you actually cared about animal welfare then doing even the barest amount of research into Kaya would show it’s BS.

Your misplaced outrage is just virtue signaling.

Oh whatever, don’t even play that proto-vegan card

I genuinely have no idea what that’s supposed to mean.

If you actually cared about animal welfare, or just pets I guess, then doing even the barest amount of research into Kaya would show it’s BS.

I watched the video of the abuse happening on stream. I listened to the meritless counterpoints of Hasan’s defenders. I don’t know what other “research” you think I should do.

Your misplaced outrage is nothing but virtue signaling.

Again with the nonsense accusations. Are you incapable of having this conversation without making shit up about the people you’re arguing with? I’m not going to tolerate it. Good day.

I watched the video of the abuse happening on stream.

You watched a clip of Hasan’s dog catching her dewclaw on the edge of her bed and yelping, and Hasan being kind of rude about it because he was in the middle of a heated rant. You only think he used a shock collar because a bunch of drama slop-tubers made ‘analysis’ videos claiming to prove that he did with about the same rigor as right-wing ‘transvestigators’ claiming every school shooter is trans.

You should let scientists know you’ve developed telepathy and can determine what someone else has or hasn’t seen without being told. I’m sure they’d be fascinated. I’m not.

I mean, I think they got it right or you would’ve said otherwise.

Are you seriously playing the “you didn’t deny this specific thing therefore your accuser must be right” card? That’s an unacceptable and juvenile attack, not even close to a good-faith attempt at arguing the issue.