✧✦Catherine✦✧so this vendor is putting a CRC16 in INI files
vendor pointing at the end of an INI file (clearly containing C source code): indeed... why should I not put something that is probably a CRC-32 here?
there's a hardcoded 32-byte AES key the firmware uses to encrypt passwords... except they fucked up (made an array of u32 and not u8) and 3/4 of the key is zeroes
not that it matters a lot given it's hardcoded
i was going to register http://crackhead.engineering but it's already gone :(
to everybody suggesting other types of derangement: no, please understand, this is specifically crackhead engineering
kill it!!!
(there are 51 instance of killall something in this .so, of which 23 are killall -9)
xyhhx 
@whitequark what font is that
@xyhhx Monaspace Neon
@whitequark thanks its pretty
Brandon@xyhhx @whitequark there’s a nerd font version called Monaspice if you need that!
@be_far @whitequark hella!
Cara@be_far @xyhhx @whitequark I use the argon variant but I believe they now offer native NF artifacts from the latest release which also upgraded the number of ligature flags for better fine tuning of what is configurable.
@cararemixed ah fresh
Hugo Mills@whitequark OK, point made and taken. :)
R@whitequark how does this compare against japanese embedded systems from the 90s?
cliffle@whitequark hmmm, what disassembler are you using that's doing the pseudo-rust syntax?
RenézuCode@whitequark OMG I have seen that before, ... https://www.youtube.com/live/3ysBj4cRU5c?si=RIWRc7HbrApUe8J5
How NOT TO CODE: Intel's Linux Thunderbolt Utils Code is the WORST I have EVER SEEN!
SnowFox@whitequark Am I misreading, or it sprintfing to &buf[3] (to skip over a "ps " that's already supposed to be in the buffer?) and then immediately overwriting with sprintf to buf?
@snowfox crackhead engineering. yes.
@snowfox note the buffer is preloaded with a "ps " using a literal
@whitequark Incredible.
I can't decide if that's a potential attempt at "optimization" (moving the static prefix from the format string to the variable initializer); it's the only thing I can come up with that makes sense (even though it doesn't actually make sense as an optimization).
But it's probably better not to try to make sense of it.
Dazza@snowfox @whitequark Nobody wrote crackhead code. Someone wrote something that a compiler compiled and what it compiled it to was decompiled by BN into something that was most definitely not what the original author wrote.
I'd guess whatever the original code was it wasn't C and didn't literally use sprintf to do the string composition. It perhaps incrementally modified some sort of CoW (or some sort of reallocate when it grows) string data type in whatever language it was.
I'd guess whatever the original code was it wasn't C and didn't literally use sprintf to do the string composition. It perhaps incrementally modified some sort of CoW (or some sort of reallocate when it grows) string data type in whatever language it was.
@whitequark @snowfox
Wow. Nope, if you have checked I'm certainly not distrusting your work. Apologies.
Clearly I am underestimating the ability of crackheads to actually function well enough to produce C code under the influence.
Wow. Nope, if you have checked I'm certainly not distrusting your work. Apologies.
Clearly I am underestimating the ability of crackheads to actually function well enough to produce C code under the influence.
@whitequark Ah, 0x207370 is "ps "; I missed that (I wasn't sure what the numbers were but I don't Rust). That makes more sense, but the rest is still baffling.
Now I'm wondering if it would be a viable method of obfuscation. Probably not difficult to reverse, but annoying and fills the decompilation with chaff.
@snowfox fortunately, Binary Ninja is competently made software and lets you write a script to undo this type of damage very easily (I write them by hand but they have an "AI" thing which should allow basically anyone to do it in only a bit more time)
vvv@whitequark What tool is this? I thought it was Ghidra, but `let mut`s are rRusty, while Ghidra's pseudocode is C-like... Ta.
@whitequark lsd.engineering appears to be free, if that helps?
@darkling this is very much not the same thing!
Mad Engineering@whitequark How about unhinged.engineering, I mean, the drugs aren't the point, right?
@madengineering so my problem with this isn't that it's unhinged. it's reasonably hinged. it's just... so bad (while still working) that one questions whether it would be possible to produce this artifact while sober
Triss@whitequark @madengineering I don’t think I could do it on purpose while sober. Needs some level of extra creativity to screw it up so strangely.