Today we're leaving X. If you're still there, we think you should consider leaving too.
A word here on:
1. why it is so difficult to leave collapsing platforms;
2. why we're making this decision today;
3. where else you can find us.
Today we're leaving X. If you're still there, we think you should consider leaving too.
A word here on:
1. why it is so difficult to leave collapsing platforms;
2. why we're making this decision today;
3. where else you can find us.
@boscoandpeck
Copy that! I have the same experience.
Some people I was able to find in the #fediverse, a significant number of people I lost track of, found new interesting accounts to follow and a segnificant number of new accounts I follow are surprisingly high quality. I might even say that posts are better, more balanced and more in-depth than what I was used to on #twitter. The #algorithms on a lot of platforms tend to push clickbait and don't do quality posts justice.
@OpenMediaOrg "At the time, he was talking about the need to rein in the bots and child abuse content that plagued parts of Twitter. He called himself a fighter for the absolute right to freedom of expression."
If you went to the Butch Hartman School of "And then the complete opposite happens..."
I think it's time we revisit the editorial protection of social media, particularly with respect to algorithmic promotion. With improved AI, platforms are no longer passive hosts; they actively curate and shape content at scale. There are no shortage of evidence to support this.
If a platform can shown to exhibit bias that bias is editorial and therefore the owner subject to libel or publication of illegal material.
@FaireyMary @OpenMediaOrg @evan
Solid agree.
@Em0nM4stodon As long as we're not in a religious cult that leads to Roman Catholicism (which every Christian denomination, Muslim school of thought, and Jewish sect is forked from).
Otherwise, those Catholic dirtbags can continue to use platforms that will ultimately result in their untimely demise.