@nrmacdonald That is false. There are two LITERAL TRAITORS on the Supreme Court--neither a Trump appointee--who are owned by the same hostile foreign power as #BenedictDonald. If you havent looked at my bio, maybe do so: I'm not just pulling that out of my ass: the agencies in which i led LITERALLY WATCHED them be turned--because watching THE RUSSIANS THEY WERE TALKING TO was part of our due-course mission.

The rest of the court--the record clearly shows--are still acting pretty much like justices appointed by progressives or conservatives--and while sometimes cowardly and often partisan, seem to want the Constitution to remain in force.

I will concede that it would be a gamble. But I'm not god or king for a day: nobody's gonna ask me to choose a strategy for getting us out of this. Im just spitballing options here besides sitting on our thumbs and hoping for the best--and i wanted to toss one out there for my more influential colleagues & followers (especially on LinkedIn) that was less extreme than an outright military coup to save democracy (what i call "The Turkish Option") or a bloody civil war.

I understand (and, frankly, share) your frustration--so I'll give you one more chance to adopt a more respectful tone before I block you. If you choose otherwise, you won't be getting another detailed explanation, sorry: I just dont have that kind of time for trolls.

@nrmacdonald Looks like that won't be necessary; thanks. And I wasnt saying that to assert any sort of superiority: its just relevant to the point I was making that my assessments arent just derived second or third-hand from the news. If you can say the same, that's great: there are a higher proportion of such people over here than on the Bird Site; many of them are the audience I was referring to! If you're among them (and if you're not), its a pleasure to make your virtual acquaintance.

I have a little more tolerance for "partisan" on SCOTUS, as the constitutional method of their appointment shows that was part of the design. But I will also concede one more who is corrupt. Still not a majority, but like I said, a gamble. I think we're fresh OUT OF really good solutions here, though--which is why im resorting to brainstorming some pretty far out possibilities!