RE: https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic/115843073297668133

Well that means tech problems newer than 2025 won't get answered at all because nobody is asking people anymore and no new training data for the slop models is coming in as people stop doing that work for free.

@geistesgift there is significant subtlety here. “Questions asked number must go up” is not a good idea: https://stackoverflow.blog/2011/06/13/optimizing-for-pearls-not-sand/
Optimizing For Pearls, Not Sand - Stack Overflow

@codinghorror @geistesgift As far back as 2015 people were concerned with the drop off in question growth. I wasn't worried except for a corresponding decrease in answer rate. Asking questions has been less rewarding over time (both in terms of getting answers and getting reputation), which is a trend that was accelerated when people were able to avoid interacting with Stack Overflow itself by asking an LLM. The basic approach to dealing with the unmanageable flood of questions was aggressive culling. That's a great strategy as long as the flood continues, but it's pointless now that people aren't even bothering. The missed opportunity was to build pathways to help people ask better questions.

https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/305507/observation-from-site-analytics-fewer-questions-are-being-asked/305870#305870

@jericson @geistesgift the missed opportunity sounds a bit too much like the holy grail to me

@codinghorror @geistesgift

I wonder if you've had a look at the Staging Ground.