The current wave of polarization in developed economies more or less began with mass adoption of the Internet, then reached escape velocity with the rise of social media.
@paul A cynic such as myself might also note the US polarization seems coincidentally timed to the election of a black man.
It was definitely. how shall I say, overdetermined.
@paul @codinghorror that seems like a good example that correlation doesn’t imply causation.

@paul @timbray This chart is a Bezos chart despite numbers on the axis. Explaining directionality is not enough. How is polarization measured? What is negative polarization?

However ‘polarization’ is defined, it feels like it should be a ratio quantity; negative values feel very strange and might lead the reader to suspect that it’s a made-up or ill-conceived measure.

@paul it seems more like a correlation.
You can't prove causality, of course, but I'm not the first to point out the relationshp and its plausible mechanisms.
@paul Yep, but causal factors may be hundreds and well hidden until a model is proposed.
It is definitely over-determined, but it would be startling and historically unusual if connective technologies hadn't played a significant role.