Male Student Allegedly Created AI Nudes of 13-Year-Old Girl & School Suspended Her, Not Him

https://lemmy.world/post/40683204

Male Student Allegedly Created AI Nudes of 13-Year-Old Girl & School Suspended Her, Not Him - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

ITT: We victim blame.

The principal, Danielle Coriell, said an investigation came up cold that day as no student took responsibility. The deputy assigned to the school searched social media for the images unsuccessfully, according to a recording of the disciplinary hearing.

“I was led to believe that this was just hearsay and rumors,” the girl’s father said, recounting a conversation he had that morning with the school counselor.

But the girl was miserable, and a police incident report showed more girls were reporting that they were victims, too. The 13-year-old returned to the counselor in the afternoon, asking to call her father. She said she was refused.

Deepfake cyberbullying: Schools confront rise of AI-generated nude images

A 13-year-old girl at a Louisiana middle school got into a fight with classmates who were sharing AI-generated nude images of her. She wound up getting expelled — and the students sharing the images apparently were not disciplined by the school. The police took the opposite action, charging two of the boys who’d been accused of sharing explicit images. The case highlights the challenges schools face with AI-related cyberbullying. Experts warn that adults are often unprepared for the digital harm caused by such technology. Lafourche Parish School District Superintendent Jarod Martin said the school system followed all its protocols for reporting misconduct and said a “one-sided story” had been presented of the case.

AP News

ITT: We leave out the reasons for things that happened to shape the narrative into what we prefer.

Fed up, she attacked a boy on the bus, inviting others to join her

She assaulted someone and got punished for it. Being a victim of one thing doesn’t justify becoming a perpetrator of something else.

Hey man if you distribute porn of someone non consenting, you deserve at least a solid punch in the face.
What harm is done that is severe enough to justify violence? There was in no imminent threat of physical harm to themselves or others. Nobody is in danger. Being violent just because your feeling are hurt is barbaric and has no place in a society. Violence is not acceptable.
  • It’s more than just feelings being hurt, this is illegal.
  • What does this oh-so-perfect system do? Punishes wrongdoing. Guess what a fist to the face does.
  • The harm done is trauma, that poor girl is probably traumatised for life and will most likely need hours of therapy to deal with something like this. Actions hurt people, threats in the physical realm aren’t the only ones that matter.
  • You know what’s barbaric? A society where this sort of antisocial, criminal, traumatising behaviour goes unpunished. This is sexual harassment and the school didn’t want bad press so they just shrugged it off. She was forced to take matters into her own hands when the sexual harassment continued.
  • She didn’t lash out of legalities.
  • Nobody claimed perfection
  • Violence doesn’t heal trauma
  • Her actions made the situation worse for herself and likely did not do anything to stop the sharing of images.
  • the situation didn’t just naturally become worse. it’s only worse because the school shares opinions with you.
    It did naturally become worse. That’s what happens by not intervening, nature occurs. Becoming violent when you experience injustice only leads to more problems. It is not a wise or effective response.
    did the school not intervene by punishing her? the problems only arose because they agree with you.
    For violently assaulting someone, yes. The problem arose because children decided to do something hurtful to a child, not because the adults in the situation didn’t resolve it before it escalated to violence.
    the problem (her punishment) was not a natural result of her actions. it ocurred because the school interfered
    Just like the police do when there’s a shooter. What’s natural doesn’t define what is acceptable.
    i really cant understand the need to pretend that this is a sensible analogy
    Just because you don’t understand it, doesn’t mean anyone is pretending. Do you often assume people are pretending when you can’t make sense of things? Is that how you cope with being confused?
    well, it is easy to understand when not being charitable with your intentions