Male Student Allegedly Created AI Nudes of 13-Year-Old Girl & School Suspended Her, Not Him

https://lemmy.world/post/40683204

Male Student Allegedly Created AI Nudes of 13-Year-Old Girl & School Suspended Her, Not Him - Lemmy.World

Lemmy

ITT: We victim blame.

The principal, Danielle Coriell, said an investigation came up cold that day as no student took responsibility. The deputy assigned to the school searched social media for the images unsuccessfully, according to a recording of the disciplinary hearing.

“I was led to believe that this was just hearsay and rumors,” the girl’s father said, recounting a conversation he had that morning with the school counselor.

But the girl was miserable, and a police incident report showed more girls were reporting that they were victims, too. The 13-year-old returned to the counselor in the afternoon, asking to call her father. She said she was refused.

Deepfake cyberbullying: Schools confront rise of AI-generated nude images

A 13-year-old girl at a Louisiana middle school got into a fight with classmates who were sharing AI-generated nude images of her. She wound up getting expelled — and the students sharing the images apparently were not disciplined by the school. The police took the opposite action, charging two of the boys who’d been accused of sharing explicit images. The case highlights the challenges schools face with AI-related cyberbullying. Experts warn that adults are often unprepared for the digital harm caused by such technology. Lafourche Parish School District Superintendent Jarod Martin said the school system followed all its protocols for reporting misconduct and said a “one-sided story” had been presented of the case.

AP News

ITT: We leave out the reasons for things that happened to shape the narrative into what we prefer.

Fed up, she attacked a boy on the bus, inviting others to join her

She assaulted someone and got punished for it. Being a victim of one thing doesn’t justify becoming a perpetrator of something else.

I knew there’d be some one like you in here spreading some victim blame around.
If accountability is victim blaming then your worldview is not worth listening to.
Schrödinger accountability ? Be harassed and humiliated daily : nothing. Defend yourself : punition. She would have not strike him but the society forced her.
Responding to a non-physical threat with physical violence is not acceptable. Society did not force her, she chose to be violent.

When you say ‘society did not force her’, what exactly do you mean by this?

Can you spell out the scenario that you concocted in your head as to how a girl, harshly bullied by having faked nude material of her passed around school without her consent, in front of her should correctly behave in this situation? Keeping in mind, of course, that she already went to the socially acceptable and correct official channels which did nothing to help her?

Why don’t you ask the poster above what they meant by it and then we can discuss.

Feelings are not an excuse to become violent, even if you don’t see any other option than to suffer.

It 100% is: legally, you have the right to physically defend yourself from nonviolent crime- im allowed to hit the guy trying to break into my car if he doesnt stop when I yell at him to do so.
He’s damaging your property and putting your physical security at risk. Both are crimes of violence. It isn’t an emotional crime. If he says something mean, you don’t get to punch him.

If you genuinely think that breaking into a car is less violent than making and distributing child porn of someone then there is something very wrong with you.

The boy was committing a sexually violent act that was designed to intimidate, humiliate and harm.

It is absolutely less physically violent, I was never discussing violence in the broadest sense of the term, but physical violence.

It is absolutely less physically violent, I was never discussing violence in the broadest sense of the term, but physical violence.

Which is interesting and perhaps you should review why you are selectively focusing on this - it is the reason people are saying you are victim-blaming, after all.

You selectively pick the physical violence the victim employed as a reaction to the sexual violence she experienced. You consciously choose to ignore the sexual violence having been done to her, and in fact spell this out very clearly in your response here.

In other words, you choose to ignore the violence the perpetrator originally employed, and only want to ‘discuss’ (i.e. delegitimise) the responsive violence employed by the victim as her last method of harm reduction. That is the classical rhetorical device used to victim-blame, and if you still actually can’t see it I’d suggest reading up on that and investigating your own ethics.

I don’t agree the sharing of AI generated images is violence. I also don’t agree that a victim loses agency or its associated accountability.