@itsfoss it's called unsafe Rust for a reason. Unsafe code is virtually a necessity when working with such low level code. This does NOT take away the fact that Rust is genuinely memory-safe.
Here come the Rust haters booking on the language 🙄
@nick@itsfoss it surely prevent memory related pitfalls, but does correctness get a bit much in the way when you’re doing unsafe work in the very specific world of kernel development ? And I can’t see how it prevents actual code logic errors, logic errors are a great source of crashes and vulnerabilities, right?