Fi 🏳️⚧️"AI" is rapidly becoming synonymous with "poor quality crap"
I am enjoying seeing this become more obvious.
The fun part about this is the race to the bottom - see, quality is one of the factors people consider when they evaluate whether something is worth the money they're being asked to spend for it.
The lower the quality, the lower the price they're willing to pay.
And now "AI" generated crap is showing up heavily in lowest-quality garbage and spam.
Even if your brand claims to be "high quality" it's going to be tainted by association with "AI"
This was inevitable, in a way, thinking about the history of how it's been marketed and priced.
Nicole ParsonsAI features characterized as "too easily available", when it's really shoved down our throats unwillingly is more like it.
Microsoft Windows
Every browser
Google search
Facebook
Household appliances
Vehicles
Phones
Email
Cloud storage
'Advertising' embedded in everything, movies, podcasts, operating systems, music, TV, etc
Each update requires spending several minutes shutting off & disabling settings to thwart this Orwellian wannabe state surveillance platform slash spyware.
Hi, I'm talking about the economics of it; if you wish to vent about your dislike for Microsoft, kindly start your own thread.
Microsoft and Charles Koch are spending a billion dollars to promote AI to the poor.
Definitely a red flag. None of these billionaires give two hoots about "economic mobility".
Flogging AI to make it popular is a cover for an anti-democracy movement
The fossil fuel industry is funding the AI bubble for its own reasons; personal & partisan gain.
Follow the money behind AI.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/koch-venture-arm-bets-40-million-on-logistics-tech-optimal-dynamics-1d995b51
https://www.wired.com/story/trump-energy-industry-ai-fossil-fuels-pittsburgh-summit/
Ned Hamson