Not sure when you've used #AI 👉properly👈.
In my experience the more vocal opponent of AI is the further back in time their (lack of use) goes.
With the most ardent opponents having never used the models, yet having most empathic (and increasingly inaccurate) opinions.
Attached media, a public query from today, with sources dropdown at the bottom.
Approx 30% of web searches comes from the engines nowadays.
(Edit: Hahaha, insta blocked by poster, I guess folks don't like to be called out on saying patent provable falsehoods 🤡
The poster, made a comment exposing their ignorance of features of existing AI. This one has 33,000 followers, question is "How many others like them have zero idea about the systems they critique"?)
#llm #ai #luddites
@n_dimension That's just a LLM googling. It doesn't have the sources, it uses tool calls to use search engines and scrape web pages.
A LLM using a search engine under the hood is not proof that a LLM can replace a search engine.
And it doesn't solve fundamental problems (that can only be solved with a very different kind of training and different tools) such as making shit up and not giving credit to the source material of the training data (except for very well known things and only when you ask explicitly).
The sources are at the bottom of the dialogue.
You click it shows sources.
You need a computer to see it.
A computer is like a slate tablet only it uses electricity.
Your library has one.