Programmers are no longer needed!

https://lemmings.world/post/37836589

LLMs often fail at the simplest tasks. Just this week I had it fail multiple times where the solution ended up being incredibly simple and yet it couldn’t figure it out. LLMs also seem to „think“ any problem can be solved with more code, thereby making the project much harder to maintain.

LLMs won’t replace programmers anytime soon but I can see sketchy companies taking programming projects by scamming their customers through selling them work generated by LLMs. I‘ve heard multiple accounts of this already happening myself and similar things happened with no code solutions before.

Your anecdote is not helpful without seeing the inputs, prompts and outputs. What you’re describing sounds like not using the correct model, providing good context or tools with a reasoning model that can intelligently populate context for you.

My own anecdotes:

In two years we have gone from copy/pasting 50-100 line patches out of ChatGPT, to having agent enabled IDEs help me greenfield full stack projects.

Our product delivery has been accelerated to while delivering the same quality standards verified by our internal best practices we’ve our codified with determistic checks in CI pipelines.

The power come from planning correctly. We’re in the realm of context engineering now, and learning to leverage the right models with the right tools in the right workflow.

Most novice users have the misconception that you can tell it to “bake a cake” and get the cake ypu had in your mind. The reality is that baking a cake can be broken down into a recipe with steps that can be validated. You as the human-in-the-loop can guide it to bake your vision, or design your agent in such a way that it can infer more information about the cake you desire.

If you’re already good at the SDLC, you are rewarded. Some programmers aren’t good a project management, and will find this transition difficult.

You won’t lose your job to AI, but you will lose your job to the human using AI correctly. This isn’t speculation either, we’re also seeing workforce reduction supplemented by Senior Developers leveraging AI.

One of the rare comments here that is not acid spewing rage against AI. I too went from “copying a few lines to save some time” and having to recheck everything to several hundred lines working out of the box.
Everyone has different anecdotes, I do not know how recently they used AI, and I know that if I start outsourcing to AI I’ll go fully down the rabbit hole and never actually learn the stuff myself. So I am never sure what to trust, especially since everyone on any side of a debate has phrases they can use to dismiss those who disagree as irrational and full of bad takes in a way that looks like a reasonable dismissal to someone who does not know all the facts. All I know is emotionally I really want anti-AI to be right, and fact-checking everyone’s anecdotes by myself by using the AI myself would probably pull me down a rabbit hole of becoming too dependent on AI for my comfort (I am quite good at just never starting the bad thing I don’t want to do, but if I ever give in once I tend to give in all the time—it is horrible that my behavior works in such an all or nothing way but it is what it is).