Let's start with Theo being on the Business beat. I'm sure this won't colour the entire tone of the "InDepth" article.
/1

Right from the start: how very dare these busybodies oppose our sexy chonky cars?
/2

Whomst among us has not needed to fit a three-foot length of pipe in the back?
/3

I think the BBC caption writer is getting baked on the job.
/4

Ah yes, hatchback, saloon, SUV. The three genders.
/5

Finally, we come the the real reason why SUVs are more numerous, but then Theo gets it arse-backwards. Could it be that SUVs are being *pushed* on people *because* of the profit margin? But no, it's presented as the kindly and benevolent carmakers rising to meet the perfectly natural demand.
/6

I'd love to know how Alex, who works for an automative-focused organisation, can think that vulnerable road users have been prioritised by being... more likely to be harmed? Maybe I just need some blunt-force trauma to the head from an SUV to understand it.