GrapheneOS decided to leave France because they would have to implement a backdoor for French authorities.
What about backdoors in #IodeOS as Iodé is a French company?
https://goingdark.social/@watchfulcitizen/115605398411708768
@[email protected] is being threatened by French authorities for refusing to add backdoors and they're dealing with coordinated attacks in French media right now. They're pulling out of France entirely, moving all their servers, and fighting off a wave of bullshit one-sided reporting that makes them look like they're helping criminals. They need us to fight back. Support them however you can, whether that's a dollar, sharing their story, pushing back on the garbage news coverage when you see it, or just telling someone you know about what's happening. All of it matters because they're drowning in attacks from governments and media and bad actors who want them gone. This is the only Android OS that actually makes me feel like privacy isn't just marketing. They fight for us now they need us to fight for them. The EU is pushing Chat Control and creating an environment where governments feel empowered to threaten developers into compliance, and if we stay quiet we're letting it happen. Show up for them in whatever way you're able to. #grapheneos #Privacy #NoBackdoors #encryption #security #chatControl
I am interested in that issue too.
I'm planing to get an IodeOS phone and i highly oppose the idea of "scan-on-device" / cliwnt scanning backdoors in Software.
Not only having a single App with such a backdoor in, but the base OS having one, is even worse...i didn't know this was law in france already.
Even if i am not in danger to be targeted in an legal investigation, does such a backdoor not pose a great risk to be hacked by criminals via that way too?
@GrapheneOS @Uddelhexe @plumeros
Got it...
Looks like there are some nuances as well
https://us.norton.com/blog/mobile/android-vs-ios-which-is-more-secure