Surprise EU rollback of 'GDPR' digital-rights rules prompts alarm

https://lemmy.zip/post/52834246

Surprise EU rollback of 'GDPR' digital-rights rules prompts alarm - Lemmy.zip

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/52834195 [https://lemmy.zip/post/52834195] > https://archive.is/je5sj [https://archive.is/je5sj] > > > “If adopted, these amendments would not simplify compliance but hollow out the GDPR’s and ePrivacy’s core guarantees: purpose limitation, accountability, and independent oversight,” Itxaso Dominguez de Olazabal, from the European Digital Rights group, told EUobserver. > > > The draft includes adjustments to what is considered “personal data,” a key component of the GDPR and protected by Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

Doesn't seem terribly surprising to me, the existing rules make it very hard to make use of data for AI training in the EU. Other parts of the world have looser restrictions and they're developing AI like gangbusters as a result. The EU needed to either loosen up too or accept this entire sector of information tech being foreign-controlled, which would have its own major privacy and security problems.

the existing rules make it very hard to make use of data for AI training in the EU

Yeah, like, that’s the whole point of privacy… Are you that retarded or did you get a paycheck from Sam Altman?

There really is no need for this rudeness. I'm sure you can make your point without resorting to this sort of language. Let's try not to turn into reddit.
*threat of ban: “meh” *threat of redditification: “oh shit, oh shit”
I explain why I think the thing the article is about is happening, I get pummelled with downvotes because people don't like the thing I'm explaining. Someone calls me a retard, they get as many upvotes as I got downvotes. Seems like we're already in a pretty bad spot.
I suspect people disliked both of the approaches you suggested, or thought it was a false dilemma fallacy, but downvotes rarely come with explanations.