In two recent public speaking engagements, I made a comparison between the obesity epidemic in various pockets of the globe and AI. Several people came up afterwards and said that was the best analogy they'd heard, so maybe it's worth repeating here. Also, I feel like this one will hold up a while.

What I said was some recent CDC figures show that something like 55 percent of the average American diet comes from processed or highly processed "foods," and the numbers are even higher for kids. In a similar way, so much of what AI produces is akin to highly processed data: Its myriad origins are murky at best, you often don't feel great after using it a while, and if you are exposed to it too much it might just freaking kill you.

@briankrebs
Don’t do this.

Food is necessary for survival, AI isn’t.

If you have $40 to feed a family of four for a week, nobody’s getting organic arugula salads with tomatoes and crumbled feta for lunch, are they?

Healthy whole food is a privilege and a luxury. Never forget that.

@cynthiarose We're big supporters of our local food banks and farm co-ops, because people should be able to have access to better food, regardless of their income. In fact, this year they're getting most of our giving. But I also feel like your response misconstrues or obviates the point I was trying to make. There are ways to disagree that don't amount to "you should be ashamed for even broaching this topic." I really admire the free exchange of ideas here, and I'm apt to mute most people who proceed to lecture on what's okay and not okay to discuss.
@briankrebs I’ll just let you marinate in your own words bc wow.