In two recent public speaking engagements, I made a comparison between the obesity epidemic in various pockets of the globe and AI. Several people came up afterwards and said that was the best analogy they'd heard, so maybe it's worth repeating here. Also, I feel like this one will hold up a while.

What I said was some recent CDC figures show that something like 55 percent of the average American diet comes from processed or highly processed "foods," and the numbers are even higher for kids. In a similar way, so much of what AI produces is akin to highly processed data: Its myriad origins are murky at best, you often don't feel great after using it a while, and if you are exposed to it too much it might just freaking kill you.

@briankrebs The better comparison, in my opinion, is toxic waste, forever chemicals. AI slop poisons the well and the fields and is hard, if not impossible, to recycle. Digital toxic waste. Eats resources and doesn’t give back. A new ozone hole. And just as we did back then, we can fix it.
@jwildeboer Well that yes, and also it has a toxic affect on the people that use it most, I believe, because they are more likely to rely on it for important things than maybe they should.