Qasim Rashid, Esq.Nov 3

What if we had a 20/20 rule for elected office?
•Never more than 20 years in ALL elected office regardless of level AND
•As you reach 20 years from average life expectancy of all Americans, you become ineligible to run for re-election.

This would:
1. Prevent letting people make long-term policy on things that will never impact them
2. Create opportunities to elect new people for new generations
3. Incentivise actual improvement to healthcare, housing, & food to increase total life expectancy

Show threadBlueDot🇺🇦Nov 3

@QasimRashid

If we had that rule, we'd exclude experienced people with good ideas, for a completely arbitrary reason.

There's no version of term limits that is any better than simply electing better candidates.

Show threadFlowermobNov 3
@BlueDot @QasimRashid But in the US with voter particiapation so low, how do you get better candidates elected. In the event the country survives the current coup attempt, will the Democrats actually prosecute the fuckers and change election rules to make it simple to vote so more people will vote? And will the FCC throw Fox and their christo-fascist talking heads off the air?
Show threadBlueDot🇺🇦

@Flowermob @QasimRashid

Democratic candidates in every primary are going to have to support those things to get my support. And they'll have to support bringing in the #InternationalCriminalCourt to prosecute crimes against humanity, as well. To whatever extent the leadership won't support that, they can be gleefully replaced.

Making people quit when they're old isn't going to get us to those goals. We need all our oars in the water.

Nov 3 at 6:33pmWeb