“I’m an enormously optimistic person about the world in general, but I think the demoralising effect or the humiliating effect that AI will have on us as a species, it will stop us caring about something like the artistic struggle that we will just accept what is fed to us through these things."

Nick Cave

Nick Cave on the ‘unbelievably disturbing’ impact of AI in music

Nick Cave on AI: “Its intent is to completely sidestep the sort of inconvenience of the artistic struggle, going straight to the commodity, which reflects on us, what we are, as human beings, which is just things that consume stuff.”

euronews
"Its intent is to completely sidestep the sort of inconvenience of the artistic struggle, going straight to the commodity, which reflects on us, what we are, as human beings, which is just things that consume stuff.”

@warandpeas The intent is to make it so hard to compete with machines that there is no negotiation room for creative human effort.

The TL;DR of The Dictator's Handbook is that democracy depends on human effort being valuable, and where there are alternarive sources of income to a government, dictatorships arise.

AI is fundamentally a fascist project.

@jens @warandpeas But like all fascist projects, it's self defeating. Either AI will prove to be useless after the bubble pops, or it will succeed humanity, making the dick-taters obsolete along with the rest of us.
@warandpeas
Thanks for sharing:) Wordsmith #NickCave incisive on #humanintelligence and #automation of "creativity'
@warandpeas People sometime appreciate art for just what's there - but more often people appreciate it for what went into its creation. The skill, passion, feelings, wisdom, novel new ideas, etc... That's why looking at AI works will always feels kind of empty. And there's a risk that being swamped that that stuff devalues 'real' art. (Even aside from all the other moral and monetary problems.)
@karadoc @warandpeas Initially, the volume of AI Slop will devalue real art. But eventually, people will seek out art they can watch created and know it's real. But it will be rare, precious, and VERY expensive.

@SteveJB @karadoc @warandpeas What is art? Is the banana taped to the wall art? Is Beuys art? I do not think we can say what “real” art is.
But there is more: There are different mediums. Delarouche did “Painting is dead” after the Daguerreotypes were introduced (https://siarchives.si.edu/blog/photography-murdered-painting-right). But it did not happen.
One could say AI will become a new medium of art. If a snapshot of an iPhone makes a brilliant picture - and somebody paints it and it looks hypothetical identical (or the other way round), both have their value. Both are art. But different kinds of art. Both have their value, or do not have their value, depending on your perspective.

I am not saying at all that all AI generated images are art - in the same way that I o not say that all painted pictures are art!

So: do not paint (no pun intended) everything with the same brush - both CAN have their value. For all art media there is a lot of rubbish ou there (and particularly for AI at the moment - some probably would say that there is no AI art yet, some probably say there can never be…) but try to judge them in their own merit. Do not compare the Mona Lisa with the duct banana (https://www.npr.org/2024/11/21/nx-s1-5199568/a-duct-taped-banana-sells-for-6-2-million-at-an-art-auction) on the wall.

Photography Murdered Painting, Right?

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="251" caption="Untitled, 1890, by Thomas Smillie, Cyanotype, Smithsonian Institution Archives, Thomas Smillie Collection (Record Unit 95), Image ID: RU95_Box77_0021."][/caption] It’s inevitable. Whenever someone tries to recount or evoke photography’s impact on visual culture when Daguerreotypes were introduced in 1839, a statement attributed to the French history painter, Paul Delaroche (1797-1859), gets dusted off for re-use.

Smithsonian Institution Archives
@RMKrug @SteveJB @karadoc @warandpeas How very dare you?! This IS art!
@RMKrug @SteveJB @su_liam
Just to clarify, when I said "real" art, all I meant was "art made by people". I wasn't trying to make a distinction between what is and what is not art.
@karadoc @SteveJB @su_liam even AI art is made by people - the ones who give the prompt. It is at a different level, but otherwise the AI would give you art without being asked.
@RMKrug @karadoc @su_liam Hmm. So, if I commission a human artist to paint my portrait, I create that art?
@SteveJB @karadoc @su_liam this is a tricky point, but the AI is a machine as a camera is as well.
@warandpeas Similar shit happened to food over the past 150 years: from preparing an honest meal by cooking raw ingredients, to fake processed foods in plastic bags, has some parallels. We'll stop by to listen to actual live performances, and no more digitally produced audio anymore.
Condition: let go of electronic devices like phones and computers to listen.

@warandpeas Future non-human anthropologists will refer to our species colloquially as “the eaters”.

(In the early 80s some fellow High School students had a punk band called “The Consumers”. Right on the money!)

Play in Israel, just don’t pretend you didn’t know

Nick Cave, Radiohead and others not heeding the BDS call can no longer hide behind their empty rhetoric on Israel.

Al Jazeera
@pelle
Zionism is a nationalist movement seeking to create a homeland for the Jewish people on historically Jewish territory.
Anyone who talks about the war started by Gaza as genocide against the people of Gaza is an uneducated child. They are not ready for adult conversations. They still believe in unicorns, fairies, famine (which did not happen), genocide (which did not happen). Simply an immature and uneducated child. 🤷‍♂️

#HamasApologist #TerrorApologist
Libera Site