Windows 10 refugees flock to Linux in what devs call their "biggest launch ever"

https://futurology.today/post/6884130

Windows 10 refugees flock to Linux in what devs call their "biggest launch ever" - Futurology Today

Lemmy

I’m old enough to have seen this “flocking” several times. Some people stay and are pleasantly surprised. Most people go back a few weeks/months later, and leave a “Linux suxx” post behind them. I don’t expect this time will be any different, and that’s totally fine.

I’ve been trying to switch to Linux for at least 5 years. I wouldn’t say it’s any better now than it was then. I desperately want to love Linux, but it fights me at every step of the way. As a media pc… I have had zero success using it as a media pc. My one requirement is an on screen keyboard, but it doesn’t come with one, and all the offerings I’ve found are shit. They won’t work in some windows, or at all.

As a laptop… This has been the most successful. I’ve not had any real issues with Linux on various laptops, other than finding replacements for certain windows software, but that’s not really a Linux problem.

As my main pc… Gaming has been fine. Hdr has only really recently become a thing, and it seems fine. However, I’m constantly coming across stupid things are ARE a Linux problem. Downloading and installing software has too many methods. I understand downloading a file to install something. I understand downloading a script to install something. I even understand why you’d need to make that script executable before it’ll work. I don’t understand what to do with a bunch of random files that claim to be an installer but don’t seem to have an install script or a .deb package. I don’t understand why once I map/mount a network drive, it fucking disappears after a reboot and needs to have the mount process be automated at every reboot.

Linux is just hostile to users. And while it is, it’ll never massively succeed.

LTSC is a much better option.

I understand downloading a file to install something.

That’s a terrible start.
Software installation sources by priority:

  • Package Manager
  • Flatpak
    (Graphical utilities like Discover unite these two)
  • AppImages downloaded from the browser
  • Rpm/Deb packages downloaded from the browser, but really should be avoided
  • ONLY IF YOU REALLY KNOW YOUR SHIT YOU CAN RUN SCRIPTS TO INSTALL STUFF
  • You can add other stuff like toolbox after n.2 once you’ve got more experience.

    Your reply seems to insinuate that all the software I could ever need will be included in the package manager. That’s just stupid.

    I agree with your order of preference, but when I start having to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find what I need, it becomes hostile.

    Your reply seems to insinuate that all the software I could ever need will be included in the package manager.

    Why would I make it a list if that was true? It would be just “1. Package Manager”

    That’s just stupid.

    If you smell shit everywhere you go…