@gaghyogi49 mmm, purely academically though "Kurtzman Trek" is a very useful categorization. It doesn't even necessarily uniquely demean the Trek in question if one is aware enough of Trek's production history. Like, Berman Trek was also definitely an era, and similarly the guy in question was definitely a problematic dude with some wrongheaded ideas about how to do Star Trek, and people working on Star Trek still created a lot of great stuff (alongside some not-so-great, especially when the head honcho was most involved with something, and distinctly different stuff when he wasn't). The era of each was quite distinct, in ways that are always at least in some degree of dialogue with the suit in charge.
By contrast, NuTrek has the same labelling problem that any "New-" label does, from computer files to music genres, where it becomes increasing inaccurately named with time and subsequent eras. With Kurtzman stepping away from Trek it's going to be interesting to see what gravitational anomoly distorting the Trek nebula around it will be notable enough to be able to cite and have people immediately know what era is being referenced—for example if we get a scattered and parser set of productions as Paramount gets sold and contracts it might not have a singular person to reference in the same way and it might end up being in the short term "Post-Kurtzman", but of course in the long term "Post-" has the same ambiguity as "Nu-"…