"[Ars Technica] asked Cruz's office to explain why a senator pressuring Wikipedia is appropriate while an FCC chair pressuring ABC is not and will update this article if we get a response."
"[Ars Technica] asked Cruz's office to explain why a senator pressuring Wikipedia is appropriate while an FCC chair pressuring ABC is not and will update this article if we get a response."
The left wing has a truth bias, more like.
@molly0xfff "Provide any and all documents and communications—including emails, texts, or other digital messages—between any officer, employee, or agent of the Wikimedia Foundation and any officer, employee, or agent of the federal government since January 1, 2020."
Can he require that? Any FOI request like that would be denied (IANAL).
Edit: why isn't he asking the federal government?
The difference is that ABC already caved in.
I think the appropriate response is
"Dear Mr. Cruz, do you or don't you believe in freedom of speech and freedom of the press?"
@molly0xfff Not mentioned in the Ars Technica story is that the Manhattan Institute "research" was done with a chatbot.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2024-07-04/Recent_research
@molly0xfff "Cruz acknowledged that the organization took action on the allegations of biased editing, but questioned its motives. "The Wikimedia Foundation has said it is taking steps to combat this editing campaign, raising further questions about the extent to which it is intervening in editorial decisions and to what end," Cruz wrote."
Cruz: "Look! Bad agents tried to bias an article."
WM: "We stopped them."
Cruz: "Ohhhhh, so we're suppressing free speech now..."