Some thoughts from a guy who's tracked more than 2,500 studies on #COVID19's chronic impact:

- I naively thought this would be a short-term project and that once the long-term risks were clear, people would take COVID seriously.

- I didn't expect risks of Long COVID to accumulate with each infection as they do. I thought LC might decline over time.

- It's depressing to see how quickly we knew of COVID's chronic harm--early studies were published in 2020/21, and we ignored them.

1/3

- I thought we might learn of COVID's impact on cancer risks more quickly, but this takes a lot of time and study to understand.

- I had no idea when I started of the breadth of harm COVID might cause. My spreadsheet has tabs for cardiovascular, brain/neuro, cancer, immune, pregnancy, and other. I could've had tabs for pulmonary, fatigue, cognitive issues, psych issues, and reproductive system risks and filled those with dozens of studies. (They are all in the "other" category.)

2/3

@augieray Here in #Canada, a year or so into the pandemic, the government announced that any amount of alcohol consumption could increase your chances of getting #cancer. Struck me as an odd announcement as there wasn't much follow up, and it survived only a few days in the news cycle. Not long afterwards, research started to come out about links between #covid and higher risks of cancer. My conspiracy mind twigged on this: While I am sure alcohol can impact cancer risks, how convenient to announce that even one drink (how many of us have one drink, ever) can be linked to increased cancer risks. Gives a handy scapegoat years later when cancer rates spike, and the government can blame it on that one drink of alcohol you had, not the (apparently) global decision to put the economy and #the way things were", ahead of #publichealth...