Okay Fedi, what's your chronically online hot take?
Okay Fedi, what's your chronically online hot take?
@PastelFurry @Ethical_Complainer I think the reason for this is less because cops here are overall good, and more because we're a tiny nation so statistically egregious overstepping and abuse happens less often.
But it happens.
https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/poliserna-slog-mig-15-ganger-i-skallen
Honestly, I think you'll find very few abusers that consider themselves to be immoral. I'm sure all the cops that beat up this man think they're good people.
The system failed in this case, and it was never rectified.
Babak Karimi blir felaktigt misstänkt för barnpornografi och hamnar mitt i insatsstyrkans razzia. Efter ingripandet har han blödande huvudskador. Han anmäler poliserna men ärendet läggs ned – eftersom det inte går att säga vem av dem som gjorde vad. – Jag ville explodera när jag förstod hur fel den svenska polisen kan ha.
@PastelFurry Well, my experience with US cops has only ever been really positive. They don't abuse their authority with me, they've helped me out of a few instances, they coached me through when I knew someone going through a mental health crisis. Like.
If we go off of the metric of my own experiences, cops are great.
That said, I'm also a cishet-passing white guy.
There's a lot of privilege that affords me the ability to have a positive relationship with police. Not to say that everyone in Sweden is privileged but also, like, y'all are the fourth happiest country in the world.
I consider myself privileged but I live part time with my parents and part time with friends because I can't afford a place to live or food on my own. Privilege isn't about having a great life, it's just about how interacting with some institutions can be less awful for you compared to other people based on some intrinsic quality.@PastelFurry People have their own personal axioms that they assume everyone else has and I think it's hard to step outside of yourself sometimes and understand that not everyone else is at the same spot you're at.
The US also has the additional problem of half of us being complete morons, and I think American leftists in particular are a little exasperated having to repeatedly explain themselves.
I like being on Fedi more since I can assume most people in our furry fediverse bubble are pretty cool and anything we don't agree on usually leads to a healthy discussion (masto.social users randomly coming in and derailing the conversation aside
)
And also I think your understanding of language is spot on. The stuff I was rambling at you about is the same stuff I've had to (repeatedly
) explain to my own mother who, y'know, lives here.
That was a fun one.
@Rusty @PastelFurry You've created a friendly community here. I was never a big fan of social media and disengaged with most of it but I stay here for the nice atmosphere you you instilled in Cubhub.
Big thank you for that!
Just somehow the coolest people on the planet happened to sign up here.@Rusty @PastelFurry I LOVE this take honestly. ACAB can come off as "All police officers everywhere are absolutely horrible people!!!" which can be easily falsified if just one police officer is an actually pretty nice guy that just tries to help people out, rather than abuse power. People can also easily respond back with "Well... MY officer in my town wasn't a bastard to me. He was a chill guy"
On contrast, ACHAP - All Cops Hold Abusable Power, is a much more nuetral and, imo, useful way to look at systematic problems in the police force. It also has much more stable grounds to not be so easily falsified, despite having "All". (which usually makes a lot of statements easily falsifiable).
And also ACHAP is waaayyy too passive for how many policing alternatives and reforms we need to be investing in.@Rusty @PastelFurry ACHAP may be too passive, but it is more specific about WHAT alternatives/reforms would be needed.
When I see ACAB, I just think "WHAT kinda reforms are you even wanting?? It just sounds like you are jobist against law enforcement in general". Which I know know isn't the case. But the first impression isn't all that great.
Meanwhile with ACHAP, I think "Ohhhhh! Interesting. I haven't thought about that before. I immediately wanna back you up and reform laws so that police officers don't abuse their power"
I dunno if this is my Autism or not, but I have a higher chance of rallying for Acronyms that are descriptive in their goals, rather than Acronyms that are provocative. This is because I can actually understand their viewpoint immediately from the acronym, rather doing guesswork.