Perfect!
Hope you don't mind if I reuse.
#CharlieKirk was absolutely NOT about dialogue or debate. It's obvious from the "Prove Me Wrong" label - which frames the exchanges with him in a position of being correct (without any evidence) and puts all the burden on others with no impartial moderator or fact checking.
Of course, he would not admit he was wrong, so it was a no lose situation for him.
Try having a debate with fascists or radical religious activists and you 'll find out that facts don't matter to them. They just want to spread their beliefs, lies, hoaxes and hate.
There was a real debate at Cambridge, and we saw the results.
@assignedmale.bsky.social I'd really like to plaster this on the front page of the NYT, WaPo, etc.
Great graphic, thank you for creating.
Go to https://ground.news/rationality to stay fully informed on breaking news, compare coverage and avoid media bias. Subscribe through my link for 40% off u...