@fribbledom
can't be plain and sparkling a the same time I think?
"sparkling structured data" maybe?
Haha, I like that even better. Edited.
@xeniac @fribbledom I totally understand, as even the 32-year-old me has studied and used XML before 2020.
But :
- tags have a name as JSON properties
- attributes could be rendered as "@someAttribute" keys, still not standard, yep...
- JSON schema can be a thing, and there was attempts, not as standard as XML schemas...
- yeah, no namespaced stuff by default
=> JSON may totally be used as an XML, less verbose, more customizable, but in a non-standard way
Always the freedom vs safety debate, and the minimal weight of a piece of information problem. Real world is hard !