Just for the record, Trump can’t do this. The Constitution is very clear that the “times, places, and manner“ of elections for federal office are determined by individual states (though can be altered by Congress).

The president simply has no role in US elections (except to sign into law or veto whatever election-related bills that congress might pass).

@mattblaze Throw into the brew the situation a few years ago when states tried to require that presidential candidates publish tax returns and were shot down by courts saying that states can not modify the requirements to hold office.

Although that is not directly germane to the voter ID situation, it does reflect a policy that when it comes to election stuff, the Constitution occupies almost the entire space leaving little room for additional Federal or state regulation.

With regard to voter ID - that is an issue that is hard to oppose because it is not irrational. I believe the D's would be better off not opposing voter ID but, instead, using those resources to make sure that every likely D voter has a proper voter ID.

@karlauerbach @mattblaze Providing IDs to every voter is a really hard problem. But the Supreme Court has upheld the right of states to require it.

@SteveBellovin @mattblaze I am far from having expertise in the art of issuing IDs. So I do not understand when you say "Providing IDs to every voter is a really hard problem."

??

(I do remember back when Dave Kaufman and I were trying to figure out operating system access control matrices that we always seemed to back into the question of "how do we know who the actor is?" [Especially when a person or thing was acting as an agent with delegated authorities from another.])

I also keep bumping into the old national ID card issue - and the fears that a person could be "vanished" by a government agency. But then again, we seem to be moving pretty close to a national ID card with things like SecureID driver's licenses.

@karlauerbach @SteveBellovin @mattblaze Are you assuming everyone has a driving license? That's not a sensible assumption.

@oclsc @SteveBellovin @mattblaze I am not making that assumption. My comment about SecureID is intended to reflect that national ID cards are sneaking up on us.

BTW, as far as I know, many (perhaps most?) will issue ID cards to those who can't get (or do not want) a driver's license. I'm not sure whether there is a SecureID version of those.

@karlauerbach @SteveBellovin @mattblaze In my salad days, when I lived in the States and the President was a B-list actor with dementia, it was a real nuisance not to have a photo ID, eg when paying by cheque (remember that?). I had a non-driver ID from California DMV for a while, but that seemed stupid. Then I attended a conference in Toronto so I got a passport, and thereafter carried that.

But in recent decades I can hardly remember being asked for ID except when crossing borders or checking into US hotels. (The latter seems new since the Reagan years--maybe it started after 9/11?)

One exception is when voting in Canada but the requirements are quite loose--provincial health card and a utility bill will do. Another recent one: when I signed my will, lawyer wanted to see ID for obvious reasons. I still had my decades-old, rather ratty Canadian citizenship card in my wallet, and that was enough. If I'd known she was going to ask I'd have brought my passport.

But the need now is annual or less, not daily.

@oclsc @karlauerbach @SteveBellovin @mattblaze I've always been asked to present my passport checking into a foreign hotel, and in the countries I've visited hoteliers are required to record the identity of all guests, as a part of a more general civil registration system, even if someone else is paying. (Longer term visitors/renters must register with the local police.)
@wollman @karlauerbach @SteveBellovin @mattblaze When I lived in the US and occasionally visited Canada I don't remember being asked for a passport or other ID. When I moved to Canada 35 years ago, I don't think US visits required photo ID at hotels. It changed more recently.
@oclsc @wollman @karlauerbach @mattblaze Border crossing rituals and requirements between the US and Canada have definitely become more formal in recent years. Way back when, all Canada cared about was whether the US would let you back in, and a driver's license was seen as good enough. There are still special ways to cross that border by land, but I've never bothered—I have a passport anyway, so I just use it.
But I did have an amusing experience about 20 years ago. On a cruise ship shore excursion in Alaska, we took the White Pass & Yukon Railroad into Canada, then basically coasted back down the mountain. (Yes, the bikes had heavy-duty brakes…) Going into Canada, there were full border checks of passports, etc. Coming back to the US, though, was easy—the border guards knew the excursion guides, and simply settled for a count of people against the number of passports the guides held. Quite the opposite of what I expected!
@SteveBellovin @oclsc @wollman @mattblaze There are ski areas in the Alps where, before the EU effectively eliminated border crossings, where one had to take a passport while skiing.