Intelligent Design
Intelligent Design
Itās so weird thinking about how weāre just copying DNA.
Whatās more interesting to me is that weāre not just copying it. Weāre taking two strands of DNA and randomly choosing some from each strand. Some animals are clones of their parent, but most are a randomized mix from each parent. The strands are 99% the same, so to a certain extent itās just copying that molecule, but itās also trying to perfect that remaining 1%.
Instead of being a way to copy a molecule forever, itās a way to optimize that molecule. But, what is an optimal molecule? Itās a molecule that contains instructions to generate a creature that has 2 legs, 2 hands, a brain, etc.
I honestly donāt know any proponents of āintelligent designā who are female.
Except the Sycophantic Patriarchal TERFs who do everything their husbands tell them to do.
Triggered lmao. A flood of memories just came back like
Plenty of animals have their excretion outlet and their food inlet in the same place.
For birds the cloaca is both for excretion and sex.
No no, it is feet, as in made of feet.
For clarity I know what you mean I just love silly humour
That video is wiiiild
Bro myopia is the least stupid part of our eye design problems. Our retinas are built entirely backwards for no other reason besides evolution making a mistake and then duct taping over it too much to fix it later.
If your retina was the right way around (like cephalopod eyes) you would have:
Our eyes are built in the stupidest way possible.
Another fun fact: retinol is regenerated by your liver. Not your eyes, not some part of your brain, not some organ near your head like your thalamus which could probably get the job done if it tried, your fucking liver. Your eyes taking a while to adjust to the dark has basically nothing to do with your eyes; itās because of the delay in adjustment by your fucking liver to produce more retinal, dump it into your vascular system and wait for it to hopefully reach your eyes. Why are we built like this?!
Not just eyes.
Also, i wouldnāt consider them ācyberneticā, iād consider them āimprovedā or āupgradedā.
Nope
Nope