Google won't allow you to install Android apps whose developers' identity Google hasn't verified. Starting in 2026 in some countries and in 2027 everywhere: https://www.androidauthority.com/android-developer-verification-requirements-3590911/
Google wants to make sideloading Android apps safer by verifying developers’ identities

Google wants to make sideloading safer on Android by verifiying the identities of developers who distribute apps outside the Play Store.

Android Authority

We need to fight Google's new ID requirement for app developers. It isn't like showing ID at the airport. More like showing it at the printing press and only IDed authors are allowed to print books.

What Google doesn't talk about is that they build this ID system to ban developers and their apps.

Unfortunately, developers on Google Play are already used to this system and people have accepted Apple, so I this will be a hard fight. Digital ecosystems being closed "to keep us safe" isn't seen as a bad thing.

People saying "But I use a degoogled custom ROM, so I won't be affected" are missing the point. Apps not on Google Play are already a niche. Banning them on most people's devices is a big issue, even if some people can still escape.

Also the general trend of Google becoming more closed may make even custom ROMs impossible eventually.

In the past, when books were censored and forbidden, people could still print them in their basements and spread them. Everybody who got their hands on one, could read it. This won't be possible anymore in our new digital age.

Under-reported detail: If you don't pay a fee to Google, they limit how many people can install your apps and how many apps you are allowed to have.

Source: https://developer.android.com/developer-verification/guides/android-developer-console

Android developer verification  |  Android Developers

Android Developers

Google asks what we think of their plans to block Android app installs outside of Google Play (unless the developers let Google verify their identity and pay a fee).

Want to tell them your opinion, just submit this form:

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfN3UQeNspQsZCO2ITkdzMxv81rJDEGGjO-UIDDY28Rz_GEVA/viewform?usp=dialog

Android developer verification requirements

Use this form to submit questions or feedback about the new Android developer verification requirements announced in August 2025. You can learn more about the requirements in the Android developer verification guide. Sign up for early access here.

Google Docs

@grote

Do i understand it right, that having open source Apps from F-Droid would be no longer be technically possible on an Android phone that is not degoogled (like Murena)?
So you'd only be able to download Apps from Playstore if this becomes reality?
And ANY App developer has to pay a fee to google in order to he "verified" as allowed App?
Which gives Google finally complete controll over the App market on Android side from that day on?

@v_d_richards Yes, unless F-Droid or the devs register their apps with Google. If they have few apps and few installs, they may be able to do it without fee, but will need uploading government ID.

@grote

But i would be still able to do sideloading with say a Murena phone?

I doubt that Google will allow sideloading Apps like NewPipe that matter of factly do stuff they don't like, like allowing to watch Youtube with playlists but without showing your own IP.

This plan is complete monopolization to app usage on google and i hope they get sued.

@v_d_richards Yes, the Google Play Services will be doing the blocking. So any ROM without those will do. However: https://chaos.social/@grote/115094550898307577
Torsten Grote (@[email protected])

People saying "But I use a degoogled custom ROM, so I won't be affected" are missing the point. Apps not on Google Play are already a niche. Banning them on most people's devices is a big issue, even if some people can still escape. Also the general trend of Google becoming more closed may make even custom ROMs impossible eventually.

chaos.social

@grote @v_d_richards So on a phone that is not supported by any 3ed party ROM, ADB uninstalling Google Play Services kills this?

That would work for me, though apps from non-ID uploading devs will not be able to coexist on the same phone with Gapps. That might limit the availability of such apps, though it won't effect anyone writing apps for non-Google Play devices only.

I refuse to allow any part of Google Play into any device containing my contacts, files or any sensitive communications apps

@LukefromDC @grote @v_d_richards Every day it seems a bit more likely I need to turn a phone into just a hotspot and then actually just do stuff on a non-Googled mini tablet of some kind.
I do so few voice calls over the mobile network itself that I could probably make it work. And at this point I'm keen to go and spend money on someone other than Google just as a Fuck You.

@quokka1 @LukefromDC @grote

Fun fact: i also entertained that idea.

And maybe from this workaround could stem a niche gadget alternative.

Like:
A phone, that is simple/small like the old ones. You can phone/SMS/take photos on the Device itself ( + some retro snake games and shit) and it can serve as hotspot.
Combined with
A second device between smartphone and tablet size that uses Linux based software that has a simplified surface for easy access to programms like Signal and Co

@v_d_richards @LukefromDC @grote yep. almost exactly. Ideally I could get my service number ported to a VoIP number and then would just need a fairly dumb hotspot. I've moved most everything I can over to a VoIP number. Bizarrely I've found only one system that won't let me register/use my VoIP number - #PayPal Reminds me I should go revisit that now as there's no reason for them to have/use my service number