My ~/.dillo/keysrc for vi-like/less-like navigation, in case it helps anyone :D
R.L. Dane 
🍵 
space = screen-down
b = screen-up
<shift>space = screen-up
j = line-down
k = line-up
K = top
# no way to handle 'gg', but just 'g' works ;)
g = top
G = bottom
h = left
l = right
/ = find
H = back
L = forward
@amin's the #qutebrowser superfan. XD
For me, I've tried it and found it very usable for even fairly modern/intensive web sites, but the Blink (Chromium)-based backend (a sad limitation of modern Qt) keeps me from adopting it. Personal call.
For #dillo, it's never going to replace a modern web browser, but think of it as a great browser for the smol web. I can read any decent text-based page with it, even with a little bit of CSS formatting. It's far from perfect, and doesn't even pass the Acid2 test at this time. But it's a wonderful smol browser for the smol web. ;)
For every day heavy web stuff, I use #LibreWolf with the Vimium-C extension.
but the Blink (Chromium)-based backend (a sad limitation of modern Qt) keeps me from adopting it. Personal call.
I understand that… personally Mozilla has gone far enough off the rails that I don't think it makes a big enough difference to keep me off of Qutebrowser.
I am looking forward to the hinted possibility of Qutebrowser adding a Servo backend once that project starts making embedding more possible, though.
#Mozilla has gone hilariously off the rails. By hilariously, of course, I mean incredibly tragically.
I'm still not comfortable sending a message to every site I visit that, "Yes, I am just another Chromium-based browser, feel free to make your site only work with Chrome."
...because I fought that battle 20 years ago, and we won it. I won't go back to a single company having hegemony over the web.
Riker on the Borg-trashed Enterprise, firing on every other ship because he won't go back.
Kiazi's children, their faces wet.
Shaka, when the walls fell.
I don't see any more value in allowing Mozilla to have a monopoly on "not being Chrome" either, though. Because that's essentially what we have.
Really, we need at least three competing completely-independent standards-compliant browser engines, ideally more. Right now we have three disgustingly-corporate browser engines.
Well, yes. Terminal web browsers are in a slightly different category for the purposes of what I'm talking about, though. XD
Which is why I really love XLinks... it really straddles the two categories (terminal web browsers and graphical smolweb browsers)
Justine Smithies
Amin, minor deity of the legume realm
mirabilos