@alice

i'm bisexual

i have been told 'well just pick one'

no thanks, i am attracted to the person, not their body parts

@samiamsam @alice I stick with calling myself bisexual rather than pansexual because :

1) I’m an old, and after decades of it, I find the label comfortable and homey.

2) I can’t help it, every time I hear “pansexual” I immediately think “But I’m not sexually attracted to cookware OR goat-footed nature gods!”

3) Have you seen the fucking colours on the pan-Pride flag? Fuck that shit. Gimme my darks, thank you.

All that aside, I do understand (though I disagree) why some folks consider bisexual to be a term that reifies the (fictional) gender binary.

As such, I am trying out new self-descriptive labels to find one that is absolutely gender non-referential.

So far I’m leaning towards “junk-inclusive”, though “junk-agnostic” also has a nice ring to it.