I expect most news from the US to have an element of insanity these days, but cyber letters of marque? Really? (https://www.theregister.com/2025/08/21/congressman_proposes_bringing_back_letters/)

For a legislative body that appears to have a median age of 60, the US Congress appears to be approaching cybersecurity problems as if they were a group of stoned teenagers.

Sometimes I am hesitant to speak out publicly, but considering that I disagree with Dave Aitel I feel confident my instincts here are correct.

We (the former colleagues of USA and Canada plus our friends NZ, AU, DE, UK and FR) are wholly unprepared to start an all-out proxy war without any oversight whatsoever.

We may THINK that we are already in that state of affairs, but I promise it can and would get a lot worse faster than you might imagine were there to be additional incentives outside of just criminal theft.

Turning our critical national infrastructures into a capture the flag game for anyone else in the world to play in is unnecessarily painting the world's largest target on our own backs.

Just say no to vigilantism and retribution.

#InfoSec

Congressman proposes bringing back letters of marque for cyber privateers

: Bill would let US President commission white hat hackers to go after foreign threats, seize assets on the online seas

The Register
@chetwisniewski it also opens up the possibility of foreign governments kidnapping, murdering, blackmailing, etc people involved in these activities. Also, we already have this through the intelligence agencies.
@chetwisniewski Competition between private armies IS an expected feature of oligarchy. That said, I'm not particularly eager to see my prejudices so richly confirmed.
@chetwisniewski Well, they aren't teenagers, I'll agree. But the stoned part still rings true.
@chetwisniewski “cyber letters of marque” is a cool phrase, at least
@chetwisniewski This isn’t a new idea, Oxford 2015: https://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-03/201503-CTGA-Egloff%20F-cybersecurityandtheageofprivateering.pdf That said, I think you make a very good point about the collateral impacts that this would cause. A ship going down only affects those on the ship, and those expecting a shipment. A utility going down could affect thousands or much more!