centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

1 /

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

2 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

3 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

4 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

5 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

6 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

UPDATE: I don't know that Marc Andreessen ever actually backed BlueSky. He has publicly been critical of BSKY. More in alt text.

7 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

8 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

9 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

10 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

11 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi #fedi

centralized corporate-backed social media is problematic

12 / ?

#BlueSky #BluSkibidi #fedi

@dannotdaniel OK, this one goes from arguable into outright incorrect. Titter was never anywhere close to where the ATmosphere is now on the de/centralisation spectrum.

Yes, the network architecture of the fediverse distributes power much more reliably. As long as people don't cluster on a handful of giant services (sideyes masto.social, .jp giants, Threats, etc), in which case it's not dissimilar to the level of centralisation in the ATmosphere now, with BlackSky and others running Relays.

@dannotdaniel

Love these! Just reposting this here...

@dannotdaniel corpo enshitification. That's all.

@dannotdaniel *deep dramatic voice from nowhere*

YOU PAY WITH YOUR SOUL!!

@noondlyt @dannotdaniel I had presumed that "from nowhere" was your outdoor speaking voice.