Allow me to address the elephant in the room:

The Trump administration is not setting the course for a four-year term.

The Trump administration is setting the course for an everlasting dictatorship.

If Americans don’t want that, the window to stop them is closing quickly.

@Strandjunker

Australia here, wondering why the fuck you lot aren't on the street tearing this all down?

Unbelievable!

@solownh @Arapalla @Strandjunker

For many people, it's just nicer and way comfier to tell yourself that it's not going to be THAT bad (politics, climate crisis).

@Arapalla @Strandjunker mate, we couldn't even get the last referendum through.

@2teknoa @Strandjunker

Racism sux, big time.

So does deliberate disinformation campaigns.

But we did put 100 000 on the Sydney Harbour bridge for Gaza.

That is the energy that stops dictators.

@Arapalla @Strandjunker I'm, not advocating violence, but isn't stopping this exact situation one of the main arguments against gun control? The NRA is quick to quote the second amendment when innocent children are gunned down in a school, but when a situation arises that it was actually created for? Crickets.
@Arapalla @Strandjunker Looking from the outside, I'd say they need a Cory Aquino like figure to inspire them into action.
@Strandjunker TOLD YOU ALL SO 🚨☠🚨☠🚨☠🚨 BEFORE the VOTE !!!
@Strandjunker yeah, but the administration is acting like a collapsing dictatorship.
@Strandjunker this has been apparent for some time. It’s astonishing how few people seem to have taken it in.

@Strandjunker

The window closed when 11 million people who voted for Joe Biden in 2020 couldn’t be bothered to vote in 2024. Now everyone is up in arms because nobody bothered to read the writing on the wall that’s been there since 2016.

There doesn't need to be a land war for nations to take out their quarrels on their own populations. Riots and urban fighting can escalate unless we stop it. No geographies will be spared except by weather and infrastructure

@HamonWry @Strandjunker
Couldn't be bothered, or didn't have a candidate to vote for?

(And don't give me the "you should vote for who you are told to vote for crap that's so popular with democrats recently, that's a fascist idea that belongs squarely in the Trump camp).

@Strandjunker @leeloo @HamonWry

You should vote for the least-worst option. This was not it.

@Kirsty @Strandjunker @HamonWry
There was a fascist and a fascist supporter, and a lot of voters for whom voting for fascism was out of the question.

Only a fascist would tell people to vote for fascism anyway.

@Kirsty @Strandjunker @HamonWry
If you tell people to vote for fascism*, Donald Trump is the president you deserve.

*) that includes any candidate who supports genocide, in case you don't know what fascism is.

@Kirsty @Strandjunker @HamonWry
And btw, there were two options.

A competent fascism supporter
An actual fascist who had recently shown himself to be incompetent.

Most people would expect incompetent fascism to be less worse than competent fascism.

I don't think anyone expected 47 to be a much more competent fascist than 45. Most would expect him to be pretty much the same.

@leeloo @HamonWry @Strandjunker there was a candidate to vote for. There has been a candidate to vote for everytime, unless one is looking for perfection, and I don’t anticipate the holy savior to appear on the ballot any time soon.
@DanadasGrau @HamonWry @Strandjunker
If not supporting fascism is your definition of petfectionism, and you use that excuse to vote for fascism, you deserve Donald Trump.
@leeloo @HamonWry @Strandjunker I voted Democrat. I always do. I did not have a damn thing to do with president felonious chunk. I was telling everyone he was a sociopathic narcissist who would do nothing good for this country, in 2015. I was right about that. Refusing to vote because the sociopath’s opponent wasn’t Jesus is stupid, and is exactly what brought Fascism to the USA. Full stop! There is no rational way of disputing that.

@DanadasGrau @HamonWry @Strandjunker
Again with the complaining that people wouldn't vote for fascism because the fascist isn't jesus.

You are still promoting fascism, and so Donald Trump is the president you deserve.

@leeloo @HamonWry @Strandjunker you had a choice. A CLEAR one.

You may not get another one.

But sure, complain it wasn't *your fault*

@pixelpusher220 @HamonWry @Strandjunker
A clear choice between:

1. A fascist who had already shown how incompetent he was.
2. A competent supporter of fascism.
3. A third party.
4. Staying at home.

I would prefer 3 over 4 with 1 and 2 being completely out of the question. But in the US, a lot of people have a hangup about 3, leaving only 4.

If you choose 1 or 2, a fascist is who you deserve. I.e. Donald Trump.

@leeloo @HamonWry @Strandjunker

You're saying that Harris would have deployed the Nat Guard to LA, to DC?

You're saying Harris would have attempted to declare protests *rebellions*?

Utter bullshit and you are the reason we're here.

Perfection does not exist but pure evil got elected because you decided purity was more important.

Good Day.

@HamonWry @Strandjunker I was writing “sociopath” on my facebook wall from the moment Trumpty Dumpty announced his candidacy. Fat lotta good it did. It did get me repeatedly put in facebook jail, but that was about all.

@HamonWry @Strandjunker

@benroyce is probably the best person to comment on this, but I'm not sure it's just that people "couldn't be bothered”. There was an epidemic of #ToxicIdealism spread perhaps primarily by the “G-n-c-d- Joe” brigade leading a non-trivial number to not vote as some sort of masochistic protest.

The left wing must, finally, learn the lesson:
Fight in the primaries, unite in the election

@mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

It's rather weird still encountering people, as I have recently, who think "teaching Democrats a lesson" is more important than {gestures broadly}

It's also extremely entitled

That the bad effects of the Trump administration won't affect them

(Or, rather than entitlement, extremely fucking stupid to think it won't effect them.)

@benroyce @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker Remember when dammit-janet (Susan Sarandon) said she hoped Trump would win because it would hasten the revolution?

@phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

That's an actual thing on the far left and far right:

Accelerationism

Of course revolutions in the real world mean 100,000x injustice and suffering

And then what wins might be worse

Or if good wins, it begins to decay again because... some people still don't vote due to the same whiny toxic idealism- that's the real problem all along

But it's hard to get that across to edgelords vibing to the dimwit cosplay revolutionary fantasy life in their head

@benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker I sometimes envy those who think the solution is to take a page from France's history and start building guillotines.

They're optimists.

Specfiically, they think it'll go better for us than it did for France, and I envy them that kind of faith in humanity. Because France is doing great now, but how many generations did it take to get there?

Overthrowing the monarchy didn't lead to a Republic any more than England colonizing North America did. Directly, it led to a purge, a famine, an empire, and a bloody military defeat that saw the men who hadn't starved or been killed in the revolution die for the short-sighted aspirations of a small man.

@mark @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

agreed except napoleon wasn't small, that's just ancient british propaganda

@benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker I meant in terms of goals (though I did choose words to play on the old stereotype on purpose).

A whole people behind him in a country with gorgeous land and access to both the Mediterranean and the Atlantic and what does that asshole do? Try to take more land? Specifically fucking Belgium?

What a waste of lives.

(Nothing against y'all, Belgium, you are also a beautiful country with a rich and valued history. Good on ya for kicking Napoleon's ass; he deserved it).

@mark @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

we had something going in the USA for awhile. we have our demons but we were making some progress

now a bunch of morons want to learn all the lessons for why participation is the best path after all, despite the flaws, the hard way

@benroyce People always confuse "small" and "short", and, respectively, "great" and "long".

@mark @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

@benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

100,000+? He put a target on 770,000 people and the silence is deafning. He made it so that every single homeless person is illegal. #Illegal2BHomless in #AmeriKKKa but since it ONLY us #homeless people, who cares.

@justbob @benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

Many do, Bob. Try not to be discouraged, tho I know this must be hard. We see you, we care, we will act on behalf of you and all the homeless to the best of our ability.

I hope you're not in DC, and if you are, that you can get to someplace safe from Trump's goon squad ASAP.

@ginaintheburg @benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

Thanks but what is "discouraging" is the silence. I'm a veteran and even vets are silent. I swore to defend the US Constitution against terrorists and trump is one. Yet the silence is deafning.

https://beamship.mpaq.org/@bob/114910620402829816

Give your sympathy to your neighbors on the sidewalk. I swore to possibly even give my life to defend the people in this country and have been ready to fight for over 30 years. Yet the silence...

Just Bob ♒🇺🇲🪖🐧 (@[email protected])

Make this viral!!! Here we go, more #Illegal2BHomeless in #AmeriKKKa. Still doubting it was coming? I've been telling you since he was elected and you keep ignoring me. Trump signals crackdown on #homeless with order pushing local officials to act https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/24/trump-homelessness-executive-order The federal government is seeking to crack down on #homelessness in the US, with Donald Trump issuing an executive order to push local governments to remove unhoused people from the streets. The order the US president signed on Thursday will seek the “reversal of federal or state judicial precedents and the termination of consent decrees” that restrict local governments’ ability to force people into treatment for mental health, and redirect funds to support rehabilitation and treatment. The order aims to “restore public order”, saying “endemic vagrancy, disorderly behavior, sudden confrontations, and violent attacks have made our cities unsafe”, according to the order. The action comes as the homelessness crisis in the US has significantly worsened in recent years driven by a widespread shortage of affordable housing. Last year, a single-day count, which is a rough estimate, recorded more than 770,000 people experiencing homelessness across the country, the highest figure ever documented. Cities and states have adopted an increasingly punitive approach to homelessness, seeking to push people out of parks and city streets, even when there is no shelter available. The supreme court ruled last year that cities can impose fines and even jail time for unhoused people for sleeping outside after local governments argued some protections for unhoused people prevented them from taking action to reduce homelessness. #Trump’s action seeks to move unhoused pIn a report last month, the American Civil Liberties Union found that cities across the US have introduced more than 320 bills #criminalizing #unhoused people, the majority of which have passed. The crackdowns have taken place in #Democratic- and #Republican-run states alike. Advocates for unhoused people’s rights have long argued that criminalization only exacerbates the housing crisis, shuffling people in and out of jail or from one neighborhood to the next, as they lose their belongings and connections to providers, fall further into debt and wind up in increasingly unsafe conditions. During his campaign last year, Trump used dark rhetoric to talk about the humanitarian crisis, threatening to force people into “tent cities”, raising fears that some of the poorest, most vulnerable Americans could end up in remote locations in settings that resemble #concentration #camps.eople to “long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment”, according to the order. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, told USA Today, which first reported on the executive order, that the president was “delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again” and end homelessness. “By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from #addiction or #mental health struggles are able to get the help they need,” she said. The National Homelessness Law Center condemned the order, which it said “deprives people of their basic rights” and would ultimately worsen the problem. “Today’s executive orders, combined with Maga’s budget cuts for housing and healthcare, will increase the number of people forced to live in tents, in their cars, and on the streets. This order does nothing to lower the cost of housing or help people make ends meet,” said Jesse Rabinowitz of the National Homelessness Law Center. The president’s order comes after last year’s US supreme court ruling, which was one of the most consequential legal decisions on homelessness in decades in the US. That ruling held that it is not “cruel and unusual punishment” to criminalize camping when there is no shelter available. The case originated in Grants Pass, Oregon, a city that was defending its efforts to prosecute people for sleeping in public. Unhoused people in the US have long faced crackdowns and sweeps, with policies and police practices that result in law enforcement harassment, tickets or jail time. But the ruling supercharged those kinds of aggressive responses, emboldening cities and states to punish encampment residents who have no other options for shelter. In a report last month, the American Civil Liberties Union found that cities across the US have introduced more than 320 bills criminalizing unhoused people, the majority of which have passed. The crackdowns have taken place in Democratic- and Republican-run states alike.

Beamship

@justbob @ginaintheburg @benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

(think i'm gonna have to fire up the ole vpn to access that link due to #OnlineSafetyAct #UKPol )

@miguelpergamon @ginaintheburg @benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

That is very wise. Beamship is my server but I use a VPN for any links outside our network anymore.

They haven't showed up in Portland Oregon yet but I am absolutely sure they will.

@justbob @ginaintheburg @benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

We've got our government (UK) being a complete pain in the ass more than normal.

A lot more stuff (anti-capitalist, anti-fascist, anti-genocide) has disappeared behind "age verification" gate-keeping just in the last two weeks. It's a mass increase in censorship.

I installed Proton free vpn last week.

@miguelpergamon @ginaintheburg @benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

I haven't heard anything new but a few weeks back, Proton was talking about AI... 😨

@justbob @ginaintheburg @benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

As we say, "Bloody Hell!"

The free-email that comes with the vpn has social-media buttons (usual suspects -- facebook, x, reddit) and in my one there are links to three UK banks.

@miguelpergamon @ginaintheburg @benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

I've been talking with someone about building a global VPN WAN. I'm sure that if they can get it working and we can "partner" it with MPAQ's system, we will be blocking ALL ad systems... I can see how to do it in my mind 😂

@justbob @ginaintheburg @benroyce @phaedral @mmalc @HamonWry @Strandjunker

That's way beyond my once meagre techy ability!
👍

I think a banking system not controlled by the military-industrial-spy complex is needed.
Anyone can start a bank.
That's the problem with loan sharks (they just become part of the system).