A fellow retired baby boomer (writing to the Guardian) makes a number of points I might also have made....
A fellow retired baby boomer (writing to the Guardian) makes a number of points I might also have made....
@ChrisMayLA6 what puzzled me about Inman's article is the reference to the tax breaks you get by retiring early.
Apart from the fact that you have to accumulate more in your pension quicker and higher rate tax relief on pensions make this easier - if you have the income - I can't think how any of you make tax savings by retiring early, in fact you get tax breaks by retiring later, after state pension age as you stop paying NI contributions.
Of course this doesn't mean so much now you have to wait so long for a state pension.
NB at one time there was a limit ('lifetime allowance') on how much you could accumulate into your pension tax free, and it used to encourage e.g. (well paid) GPs to retire early, but the limit has now gone.
Ha ha, I assumed it was a snide reference to the retired not paying income tax on earnings anymore because they had (errr) retried....
@ChrisMayLA6 nice to know I don't have to pay tax anymore. I'll have to tell HMRC as it will be news to them too.
But yes, I suppose it applies if you retire early and your private pension was less than £12,570 (the personal tax allowance) but I'm not sure many would chose to live on that (similar or less than the basic state pension) and you might still need to pay into NI to get the years in for your full state pension. And if you retire early you will generally get a smaller pension that if you had waited to your regular retirement age anyway.
Of course some people have to retire early because they are no longer fit to work or otherwise can't work eg because of caring responsibilities.
Great; I was a mature student (I did my second masters in my late 50s too), from UG to PhD....
UG = undergraduate/first degree - sorry, a standard university acronym
Hey, asking is never a problem....
normally seen as between 15-20 years - I was born in 1960 & am usually included....
While that din't enter my reasoning for retiring at 61, its certainly part of the economic outcome