That's 5D-educational chess.

#FuckGenAI #ChatGPT #GenAIsucksCamelDong

@Eatsbluecrayon Another demonstration would be to bring a chessboard to class, along with extra pieces, and have the class play chess with an AI of their choosing. They’ll get to watch with their own eyes as the AI fabricates positions and pieces.

This is especially useful because computers have been beating human opponents at chess for a long time now, so people know that chess is something computers can do. That an AI can’t indicates it is worse than its predecessors.

@WhiteCatTamer @Eatsbluecrayon that's cause it's not an AI, but a really fancy autocorrect. DeepBlue and the like were probability machines using complex computational algorithms and ChatGPT just strings words together that make some kind of grammatical sense, in which grammer =! logic. The mistake that people are falling for is the thought that language is mathematical. It is not. Language is culture, which cannot be summed up through math and numbers. Culture is the synthesis of human emotion and connection. No machine can replicate that. Ever.

@jadedtwin @WhiteCatTamer @Eatsbluecrayon

If you don’t believe everything can be expressed in numbers then consequently you must believe there is some “magic” in which numbers are meaningless.

That simply isn’t the case. From the count of neurons firing, to their relations and positions: every “emotion” can be described with numbers.

Magic or numbers. That’s the choice.

Thus: language is math (numbers encoded).

@altruios @jadedtwin @WhiteCatTamer @Eatsbluecrayon Perhaps you've not read, or understood, Godel's Theorems etc.

Maths *is* amazing, for example, in being "unreasonably good" at describing the workings of the universe to incredible precision.

HOWEVER, as well as Godel, we also have hand-wavy math of QFT e.g. the "Yang–Mills existence and mass gap" Millennium Prize Problem.

Let alone struggles to describe "complex", "chaotic" etc. systems.

Maths limitations are as incredible as what it does.