When states/countries enact laws banning porn, people are always tempted to come up with creative, edge-case solutions.

“Couldn’t you just mix the porn in with other content so the definition of your site changes?”
“Could you label it as ‘art’?”

I get where you’re coming from but this is not the solution. Porn deserves to exist. Please stop telling adult creators to twist into new positions and jump through hoops: fight the laws. Unpack your shame and speak up: porn is not harmful.

@girlonthenet Aside from porn deserving to exist, I don't know if I should laugh or cry about vanilla people believing this is easy. I got a cover image flagged because it was "pornographic for showing...a naked butt and nothing else, no other person, no toy, nada. I've had pictures of Renaissance sculptures, literal, undisputed art, flagged as pornographic. So no, while porn *is* art, it doesn't work that way.