Especially for the #Labour administration in the UK; the Supreme Court in the UK, all the #TERF and Terf adjacent people out there, the media, especially the #Guardian.
#Rights #HumanRights #ProChoice #Autonomy #Biology #Facts

Once again, for those still quoting primary school level science:

Rebecca Helm, a biologist and an assistant professor at the University of North Carolina, Asheville US writes:

"Friendly neighborhood biologist here. I see a lot of people are talking about biological sexes and gender right now. Lots of folks make biological sex sex seem really simple. Well, since it’s so simple, let’s find the biological roots, shall we? Let’s talk about sex...[a thread]

If you know a bit about biology you will probably say that biological sex is caused by chromosomes, XX and you’re female, XY and you’re male. This is “chromosomal sex” but is it “biological sex”? Well...

Turns out there is only ONE GENE on the Y chromosome that really matters to sex. It’s called the SRY gene. During human embryonic development the SRY protein turns on male-associated genes. Having an SRY gene makes you “genetically male”. But is this “biological sex”?

Sometimes that SRY gene pops off the Y chromosome and over to an X chromosome. Surprise! So now you’ve got an X with an SRY and a Y without an SRY. What does this mean?

A Y with no SRY means physically you’re female, chromosomally you’re male (XY) and genetically you’re female (no SRY). An X with an SRY means you’re physically male, chromsomally female (XX) and genetically male (SRY). But biological sex is simple! There must be another answer...

Sex-related genes ultimately turn on hormones in specifics areas on the body, and reception of those hormones by cells throughout the body. Is this the root of “biological sex”??

“Hormonal male” means you produce ‘normal’ levels of male-associated hormones. Except some percentage of females will have higher levels of ‘male’ hormones than some percentage of males. Ditto ditto ‘female’ hormones. And...

...if you’re developing, your body may not produce enough hormones for your genetic sex. Leading you to be genetically male or female, chromosomally male or female, hormonally non-binary, and physically non-binary. Well, except cells have something to say about this...

Maybe cells are the answer to “biological sex”?? Right?? Cells have receptors that “hear” the signal from sex hormones. But sometimes those receptors don’t work. Like a mobile phone that’s on “do not disturb’. Call and cell, they will not answer.

What does this all mean?

It means you may be genetically male or female, chromosomally male or female, hormonally male/female/non-binary, with cells that may or may not hear the male/female/non-binary call, and all this leading to a body that can be male/non-binary/female.

Try out some combinations for yourself. Notice how confusing it gets? Can you point to what the absolute cause of biological sex is? Is it fair to judge people by it?

Of course you could try appealing to the numbers. “Most people are either male or female” you say. Except that as a biologist professor I will tell you...

The reason I don’t have my students look at their own chromosome in class is because people could learn that their chromosomal sex doesn’t match their physical sex, and learning that in the middle of a 10-point assignment is JUST NOT THE TIME.

Biological sex is complicated. Before you discriminate against someone on the basis of “biological sex” & identity, ask yourself: have you seen YOUR chromosomes? Do you know the genes of the people you love? The hormones of the people you work with? The state of their cells?

Since the answer will obviously be no, please be kind, respect people’s right to tell you who they are, and remember that you don’t have all the answers. Again: biology is complicated. Kindness and respect don’t have to be.

Note: Biological classifications exist. XX, XY, XXY XXYY and all manner of variation which is why sex isn't classified as binary. You can't have a binary classification system with more than two configurations even if two of those configurations are more common than others.

Biology is a shitshow. Be kind to people."

Many thanks to Traci Drake for finding this.

@HarriettMB
This post was a major eye-opener for me, Harriet.
And it provided fascinating factual information of which I was not aware.
I just wish I could get this through the skulls of those who use the, "How many sexes are there?" question as a cudgel.
Thank YOU for posting!
#Gender #Sex #NonBinary #Biology
@Guillotine_Jones Thank you. Feel free to copy and share whenever and wherever necessary.
@HarriettMB
You're welcome, Harriet!
Bookmarked and boosted, and I will be sharing this far and wide.
Again, much thanks, and much love.
@HarriettMB info I didn't know. Interesting, and thanks for posting
@HarriettMB
Or in terms they can understand,
"if there's a lamp in the room, the room is lit, right?
Okay, well if the switch on the wall is in the up position, the room is lit, right?
Okay if the lamp is in the room and the switch is up AND the plug is plugged in and the power plant is functioning and the fuse isn't tripped and the wire to the plant is good THEN? THEN IS THE LIGHT DEFINITELY ON?!
Ah, well, I suppose you also need functioning eyes to perceive the light..."

@HarriettMB

It's complicated!: "Biological sex is complicated. Before you discriminate against someone on the basis of “biological sex” & identity, ask yourself: have you seen YOUR chromosomes? Do you know the genes of the people you love? The hormones of the people you work with? The state of their cells?

Since the answer will obviously be no, please be kind, respect people’s right to tell you who they are, and remember that you don’t have all the answers. Again: biology is complicated. Kindness and respect don’t have to be." 🙂

@HarriettMB
Thanks for posting this. Education is sorely needed in some parts of the world…

@HarriettMB Yes, biology is complicated. Yes, water is wet. No, that does not mean differences in vertebrate mammalian sexual development negate the presence of two sexes. (Yes, I've spent my life as a biology prof too.)

That's like insisting differences in human limb development mean the template is not two legs.

(If you want some really fascinating spectra of sex -- they call them mating strains -- look at some fungi. They really do have lots of different sexes. They're also not mammals.)

Arguing from biology for social tolerance (or intolerance) is pointless. Biology is a bunch of facts with various results. Tolerance is a moral imperative. They operate in different universes. Crosslinking them is like using a method to make fried fish as a way to teach math.

@HarriettMB I wish I could talk with Rebecca Helm. There was a lot of classification of chromosome female/male, hormonal female/male, genetic female/male, which all seems very binary to me. How does one determine what female chromosomes would be without having a female to judge from?

The important question is, if a scientist is studying sex, what is being studied? My understanding is it would be the study of reproduction. How and what is required to continue the species. Am I wrong?

Humans have a lot of variations, but we haven't gotten to a point that reproduction that could be said is a spectrum of compatibility. Your hormones don't determine who is a suitable partner, nor does your chromosomes. We have all sorts of indicators used to decide who you'll need to mate with for offspring, but what is the defining trait which allows procreation?

None of this seems relevant to #transgender since that is about gender and not sex. Gender being society's creation based off roles and expectations of sex, and sex being binary to that society, how is gender a spectrum?