Anyone want some good news? The DC Circuit affirmed the DDC's holding that proxy advisors do not "solicit" within the meaning of Section 14(a).

(okay, it's niche good news)

https://media.cadc.uscourts.gov/opinions/docs/2025/07/24-5105-2123183.pdf

A little easter egg here in the opinion:

ISS is registered as an investment adviser but is well aware that its major competitor Glass Lewis is not a registered investment adviser and afaik does not concede that it acts as an investment adviser

@annmlipton Hard to see how proxy advice is investment advice, especially when the SEC has said you can't pay proxy advisors with soft dollars.