Antti Talsta
Cat 🐈🥗 (D.Burch) 
Why cook at 350° for 55 minutes when the math says you can just cook it at 19250° for one minute?
StarkRG@catsalad This is why mathematicians are made to sit in the corner with their close cousins, the economists. Statisticians and logisticians are usually allowed out, but only as long as they behave themselves.
Timothy Wolodzko@catsalad Tech enthusiasts: Why cook at 350° for 55 minutes when the math says you can just cook it at integer overflow° for one millisecond?
Andrew Deacon@catsalad Because your stove would melt first
Deus Ex MacGuffin 
Like they say, work smarter, not harder
Jesus Michał "Le Sigh" 🏔 (he)@catsalad, why cook at all? Thermodynamics says it will eventually get back to room temperature anyway.
Kurau 🍵 Tired@catsalad I did some maths to help this post.
19250° divided by 360° is 53.4.
So 19250° - 53*360° = 170°
Which means you can cook it for just 170° and avoid the rotating the temperature 53 times, saving you more oven cycles in this economy.
19250° divided by 360° is 53.4.
So 19250° - 53*360° = 170°
Which means you can cook it for just 170° and avoid the rotating the temperature 53 times, saving you more oven cycles in this economy.
draeath@catsalad ablative baking?
Rev. Johnny Healey@catsalad The math doesn't actually work unless you convert to Kelvin first.
lp0 on fire 
Aleksei☃️@catsalad it's basic algebra, one can't argue with that