"What begins as a convenient shortcut risks becoming a self-reinforcing loop of diminishing originality – not because these tools produce objectively poor content, but because they quietly narrow the bandwidth of human creativity itself."

This is my primary concern about the adoption of generative AI, and a key reason i don't use it. What's supplementarily weird is that i almost never find this concern expressed by knowledgeable commentators. Do you? From whom?

https://theconversation.com/is-ai-sparking-a-cognitive-revolution-that-will-lead-to-mediocrity-and-conformity-256940

Is AI sparking a cognitive revolution that will lead to mediocrity and conformity?

During the Industrial Revolution, craftsmanship retreated to the margins. As AI becomes widely adopted, will the same happen to original thinking?

The Conversation
@cornelioid I just saw this today: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/06/05/generative-ai-runs-on-gambling-addiction-just-one-more-prompt-bro/ Not exactly a knowledgeable commentator but... he does link some other interesting sources.
Generative AI runs on gambling addiction — just one more prompt, bro!

You’ll have noticed how previously normal people start acting like addicts to their favourite generative AI and shout at you like you’re trying to take their cocaine away. Matthias Döpm…

Pivot to AI

@ed209 That's really interesting. Yeah, and the post itself is a bit partisan, but it's a risk i take seriously.

Still, the tools can be very useful if used well; and, as with other forms of gambling addiction, i expect almost all users can avoid it given access to basic material and social needs—so i see it more as a symptom of broader societal problems than as a problem of AI.

Does that make sense? AI mediocrity worries me because even the best-resourced of us may succumb to it.