Including fake studies and using AI to generate a report should instantly disqualify anyone to lead a scientific agency.
@luckytran I don't see why one should not use AI for report generation. There is nothing inherently wrong with that. People spend way too much time writing reports which nobody reads. I would prefer a future where the "scientist" provide key data and then let the reader generate her own tailored report/article from that data. I guess that's already the case for many.
@sigismundninja @luckytran because current AI is utterly incompetent at the job?

@sigismundninja
The head of the American HHS should not use (or allow to be used) AI to generate a document called "Make Our Children Healthy Again", that cites at least one imaginary paper crediting it to a real author that did no such thing. Classic "hallucination" though I hate that term.

@luckytran