Phil Giammattei
Scott D. Strader š@phil enshitti-perfection
Aaron Longchamps@phil This is why I use DNS filtering for ads/tracking. The blocking will continue until tracking improves, if ever.
Erik Play2Learn
Sebastian Lauwers@fallbackerik @heatsink @phil Iām not quite certain how listing unrelated and far fetched interpretations of the word ātrackingā is relevant here. Clearly here the discussion is about non-consensual user tracking.
Shall we mayhaps correct GP to tell them that DNS filtering wonāt improve the tracking of his vinyl player needle?
DNS-level filtering is an entirely valid way to improve oneās experience of the modern webāeven if with DoH it is increasingly becoming a (losing) game of whack-a-mole.
@teotwaki
Maybe you're right and I don't have a clue what I'm talking about. Maybe I studied this as a major and then spent weeks getting an up to date understanding of the current status quo, and this is my result? Who knows? How about allowing the possibility of learning something new?
@heatsink @phil
Maybe you're right and I don't have a clue what I'm talking about. Maybe I studied this as a major and then spent weeks getting an up to date understanding of the current status quo, and this is my result? Who knows? How about allowing the possibility of learning something new?
@heatsink @phil
George Liquor, American
Led By Fools
felix
roland
Qole
Doomstrike@phil
In all the Mission Impossible movies, has the mission ever been Impossible?
No.
Worst movie titles ever.
In all the Mission Impossible movies, has the mission ever been Impossible?
No.
Worst movie titles ever.
groxx
Window Maker Livehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headlines
Betteridge's law of headlines says:
"Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."
John šµ
Bob Thomson
JdeBPThree. @ianb uses full stops.
I don't know about Forbes, but question head answers to the New Statesman have of late been prefixed by a "Ha ha ", as well, so there are 200% extra bytes there too. (-:
J. David EisenbergMain post from forbes.com showing title of an article in Business/HollyWood & Entertainment section: Does āMission: Impossible - The Final Reckoningā Have Post-Credits Scene?
Response from Chris Plummer: If you load this page it contacts 82 IP addresses executing 256 separate HTTP transactions to download 18MB of data writing 64 cookies to your device to tell you ānoā
atomicfs@phil I see this pattern on so many websites and I hate it.
Often I look if there was a new season of some TV show or anime and I always get shit article like this. Who on earth even reads these? There is never anything interesting there. One would hope for director's journal about battle with upper management, but it is always some lorem ipsum rubbish.
These days I always rather go straight to wikipedia a check there. They always have a neat table showing seasons with their release dates.
Salocin@atomicfs Articles like this only exist so people who arenāt yet aware of them click on them and the publisher can get a few more cents from the ad companies. They have no journalistic value, they are an advertisement vehicle.
Corb_The_Lesser@phil AKA what Forbes is in business to do.
F4GRX SĆĀ©bastien@phil Looks like the european version downloads much less. what a dipshit journal.
Manuel Landesfeind@phil "What is wrong with the Internet?" by example š
@phil
All the while taking everything there is to measure about you, your first born and a third of your future.
All the while taking everything there is to measure about you, your first born and a third of your future.
Bastian Greshake Tzovaras@phil alt text: a screenshot of a social media post. The post itself has a screenshot of a Forbes headline saying "Does 'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning' Have Post-Credits Scene?" The poster in the screenshot comments: "If you load this page it contacts 82 IP addresses executing 256 separate HTTP transactions to download 18MB of data writing 64 cookies to your device to tell you "no""
CBinNYC