Pluto didn’t get smaller, science just got pickier.

https://lemmy.world/post/30169077

Pluto didn’t get smaller, science just got pickier. - Lemmy.World

Poor Pluto. One day you’re a planet, the next day you’re a “dwarf with potential.”

Do some leople think Pluto actually got smaller and thats why it’s not a planet?!

I wouldn’t put it past an awful lot of people given the stupidity I see on a daily basis.

Pluto is a strange relic that basically got considered a planet only due to the time and method by which it was observed. It was speculated that the perturbations in Neptune’s orbit indicated there was another body beyond it which everyone naturally assumed to be a planet. Clyde Tombaugh looked in the location where such an object was believed to be and found Pluto. It was assumed that this was indeed the planet in question.

Pluto was the first thing of its kind that was discovered, but it turns out that there are a lot of things in the solar system that are about the size of Pluto or even larger. And Pluto is too small to be the thing that was actually influencing Neptune’s orbit, whatever that may be. We just didn’t observe any more of those planetoid bodies until later. But after doing so, that would require us to either declare there are dozens and dozens of planets or, the slightly more sane avenue, come up with a more specific definition of what a planet actually is, which by necessity also excludes Pluto.

All the hype about is basically just down to people refusing to change what they learned in elementary school. But the thing about science is that it changes and is refined over time as we gain understanding of the universe and how things work. This is what makes science science. Anything less is simply dogma.

The explanation I heard back then was that Pluto wouldn’t qualify as a planet, EXCEPT that it has a moon. I’m not sure why that exception would apply, but it seems it’s no longer good enough.

That was an attempt to preserve the order of planets, but a failed one since there are other non-planets with moons. xkcd.com/3063

The modern definition doesn’t depend on moons. Which is good because not all planets have them.

Planet Definitions

xkcd
Well, there are seven other known sub-planetary bodies (dwarf planets) in the solar system that also have moons: Eris, Haumea, Makemake, Gonggong, Quaoar, Orcus, and Salacia. Eris in particular is larger than Pluto. So then Eris would have to be promoted to being a planet, too. Along with the other six, plus any more we might discover later. At the time of its discovery I don’t think anyone had yet observed that Pluto has a moon, and it wasn’t discovered until even later that Pluto actually has five moons.
Eris (dwarf planet) - Wikipedia